Posted on 11/24/2008 1:58:52 PM PST by tomymind
A correspondent writes:
Just returned [from Crystal]. We counted the last three precincts without incident.
Then the City Clerk made the announcement that she had found some absentee ballots that had not been processed yet from another previously closed precinct, Ward 4 Precinct 2.
Apparently Friday afternoon she was given the order by SOS [the Secretary of State] to release the names of voters who had their ballots rejected. While canvassing the absentee ballots she found 8 ballots bound together that had not been processed on election night. She claimed they were valid ballots that had been filled out by registered voters.
So she opened them in from of the crowd. 7 Franken 1 Coleman
Coleman campaign is challenging. When I asked if these ballots had been checked against the Election Day roster to make sure these people had not voted on Nov 4th she said she had not (roster has been sent to the County). Nor had she talked to the election judges who had signed these 8 ballots and for some reason bound them together. Yet she was willing to put them in the official count.
One more thing: I was asked by [a local official] to show photo ID before I could observe the recount.
I told him I wished he would be so thorough on voting day when no picture ID is required.
He replied "this is still America". Not sure what that means.
Meanwhile, in St. Paul a ballot box contained seven fewer ballots than were counted on Election Day. On official suggested that "judges in the precinct ... might have inadvertently run some ballots through twice." Franken's campaign lodged a protest.
Currently, the Minneapolis Star Tribune shows Norm Coleman with a 195-vote lead. Something like 75% of the ballots have been recounted, but a significant percentage of those remaining are from Minneapolis. Still, given the small changes that have occurred so far, it's hard to see Franken catching up, short of litigation
7 Franken
1 Coleman
SURPRISE! /NOT
What is the chance the Dims WON’T steal this one?
0-bama
That can happen when one xeroxes ballots and the wet ink makes the paper stick together.
The 195 lead means nothing. Last time I looked, Coleman had some 40 more challenges than Franken. Challenged ballots are put aside and not counted. Assuming all challenges are ignored, Coleman’s lead is probably around 150- but it’s hard to tell what’s going on.
It's starting already, "finding" so-called "lost" ballots. This is how the 'Rats do it. When they are behind, magically, miraculously, all of these "lost" ballots are somehow "found". And they always go 95-100% for the 'Rat candidate. Well just dunk my head in fuchsia glow paint and call me Fantasia, it's just such an amazing coinky-dink, you just hafta be impressed.
That can happen when one xeroxes ballots and the wet ink makes the paper stick together.Wet ink? "Xerox" comes from the Latin "xero" meaning "dry."
Your last sentence is about the only hopeful sign.
Actually, I am surprised. I assumed these 8 ballots would go 25 Franken, 1 Coleman.
WELCOME TO FREE REPUBLIC’S MINNESOTA PING LIST!
117 MEMBERS AND GROWING...!
FREEPMAIL ME IF YOU WANT ON OR OFF THIS LIST!
You mean, Coleman got 1! Some Dim is falling down on the job.
Ping!!!
Just saw on the Star-Tribune site that the Coleman lead is +199. But there are supposedly 2,331 challenges.
No, no! ENRON math is no longer allowed. ;-)
No, that would be the tally of the recently discovered ACORN-registered starting offensive and defensive lineups of the Minnesota Vikings (plus the referee and linesmen).
CORRUPTION; CORRUPTION; CORRUPTION! Kiss America goodbye.
Now, it’s +202 for Coleman.
Thanks for the ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.