[PhilDragoo]

If born in Hawaii to a non-citizen and a citizen who had not lived in the U.S. for five years after her 16th birthday he is not a natural born citizen.

He fails the constitutional test independent of birthplace; the math is not lawful, two is not five.

Al Sharpton once called him magic, but he can't surmount this bar.

[pissant]

I believe that your scenario applies ONLY to a US parent when it is an overseas birth. I’m 95% certain that is the case.

[Non-Sequitur]

If born in Hawaii to a non-citizen and a citizen who had not lived in the U.S. for five years after her 16th birthday he is not a natural born citizen.

Yes he is. Title 8 > Chapter 12 > Subchapter III > Part I > § 1401 of the U.S. code says he is. The law you quote would only apply if Obama had not been born in the U.S.

[Yaelle]

If born in Hawaii to a non-citizen and a citizen who had not lived in the U.S. for five years after her 16th birthday he is not a natural born citizen.

You are wrong.

If he was born in America, he is a natural born citizen, even if his parents were illegal aliens that crawled across the border and whelped in the desert. (Not that it should be like that, but it is.)

[cartoonistx]

"If born in Hawaii..."

I'm sorry but the law to which you refer is intended to describe the natural-born status requirements for someone born outside the US. If BO was in fact born in Hawaii he is a US citizen...period! His mother could be a peruvian chicken and his dad a red tractor!