The courts’ dismissal of these suits for “lack of standing” of the filers to demand the upholding of the US Constitution- is at least as big a story as their claims
Note to all those who say “Move along, nothing to see here...”
None of the courts has found the complaints to be without merit.. They dismiss based on the “lack of standing” of citizens to demand action!
In Berg’s case, as a democrat donor, the judge in PA blew off his suit because he could not show significant enough personal damage if a fraudulent Presidential candidate was fielded by his party - and possibly elected!.
I believe that the “lack of standing” comes from the fact that we don’t directly elect the POTUS but instead we elect electors to select the president and vp. That said, I have heard that among the several lawsuits demanding the Obama prove his eligibility, some have managed to get some of the electoral college electors to sign in as plaintiffs.
Now, I don’t see how ANY judge could rule that the electors have a “lack of standing”.