Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WE THE PEOPLE .... WANT THE VAULT COPY (certified copy of Obama's long version birth certificate)
Atlas Shrugs ^ | November 9, 2008 | Pamela Geller

Posted on 11/09/2008 1:53:43 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

WE THE PEOPLE .... WANT THE VAULT COPY

We the people,

An Open Letter to Barack Obama:

Are you a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S.?

Are you legally qualified to hold the Office of President?

This full page ad ran in newspapers nationwide. WTF is the problem? Release the vault copy. This is office of the President of the United States for G-d's sake.

Here's the analysis of the forged COLB: FINAL REPORT ON OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN (7/20/08)

And while we are on the subject of transparency - release his medical records!

Having watched the Mansourian candidate fumble and fluster his way through yesterday's press conference, I wouldn't expect to see too many of those unscripted moments. He'll need a teleprompter in his ear. heh.



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: bc; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; colb; crackerheads; husseinobama; indonesia; kenya; obama; obamafamily; obamagate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2008 1:53:44 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Hell will be freezing over in 3...2...1...


2 posted on 11/09/2008 1:55:53 PM PST by SkyDancer ("I Believe In The Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

It is not going to happen-—he’s a liberal and rules do not apply.


3 posted on 11/09/2008 1:58:31 PM PST by sierrahome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

http://www.obamacrimes.com/

Mr. Berg’s case, Berg vs. Obama was dismissed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Docket # 08-cv-4083 for lack of standing. Mr. Berg filed a Writ of Certiorari for review of the case and an injunction to stay the election pending review. Justice Souter denied the injunction. It is expected that the Court will decide whether or not to review Berg v. Obama after the Defendants file their response, and Mr. Berg has replied to the Defendant’s response.

The Defendants’ response is due by December 1st and Mr. Berg’s reply will be submitted thereafter.


4 posted on 11/09/2008 1:58:38 PM PST by GoodDay (Palin for POTUS 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sierrahome

The US Supreme court doesn’t take being brushed off lightly.


5 posted on 11/09/2008 2:01:29 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I suggest Justices Souter and Roberts begin interviewing U.S.Marshals to find a dozen or so who would not have problems arresting the Usurper and Thief.


6 posted on 11/09/2008 2:05:55 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GoodDay

dismissed ...lack of standing

*************************************

1) ... OF the people, BY the people, FOR the people ...
2) had the republicans won the election, a zillion lawsuits questioning the election process would have had ALL THE STANDING IN THE WORLD, in any court in this land. But if the unwashed masses want to see the COLB.

I am glad this is not dead.


7 posted on 11/09/2008 2:06:59 PM PST by ROTB (GOD sez "You will not envy your neighbors' [anything]." Cut it our with class envy you Communists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

It’s locked in a safe in Mombasa.


8 posted on 11/09/2008 2:08:37 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

I don’t see any arrests in his future but I guarantee the democrats would manage to get rid of him in a hurry if they smell trouble. I could see him going overseas and failing to return.

One thing is clear, the democrats won’t waste any time blaming the republicans and that’s some blame I’ll happily accept as long as we know the constitution is upheld.


9 posted on 11/09/2008 2:10:30 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

If this were any other man, and any other election that has blown my mind at the things “allowed”, I would agree with you.

I’m not optimistic.


10 posted on 11/09/2008 2:11:43 PM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

I suggest Justices Souter and Roberts begin interviewing U.S.Marshals to find a dozen or so who would not have problems arresting the Usurper and Thief.

What if Obama has an innauguration party and no one came? In other words, if he ignores the Dec. 1 deadline and the Supremes, what if the Chief Justice refuses to swear him in until he answers? Could this happen?


11 posted on 11/09/2008 2:12:29 PM PST by usmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GoodDay

Sadly, with the best legal defense money can buy and the full power of the left at his disposal, the “Defendant’s response” will probably continue to be that Berg has no standing and, with agreement from the majority of the Court, the Berg case will then reach the end of the judicial road. The ultimate question is... Just exactly who, if anyone, does have “standing”?


12 posted on 11/09/2008 2:14:27 PM PST by Route66 (........America's Main Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GoodDay

Amazing, lack of standing? He’s a U.S. Citizen, that’s all the standing he needs to bring up a constitutional issue. Appeal and move the case to a court that understands America.


13 posted on 11/09/2008 2:20:16 PM PST by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: usmom

“If the Chief Justice refuses to swear him in. . .”

A dream scenerio. Justice Roberts, take notice and act accordingly.


14 posted on 11/09/2008 2:21:50 PM PST by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Route66

Who would have standing: An employee of a State Board of Election who accepted Obama’s candidacy papers; a delegate to the Democratic National Convention; a person who donated money to the Obama campaign. Probably many others.


15 posted on 11/09/2008 2:25:32 PM PST by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues

Joe Biden?


16 posted on 11/09/2008 2:27:32 PM PST by magslinger (If you take my gun from me, mind the barrel. It will be hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I don’t get it, if Hawaii had it, they would have no reason not to release it. Its not right for the government to hold his record back from the public. Americans (should) have the right to know for sure whether or not our president-elect is in this aspect a fraud.


17 posted on 11/09/2008 2:29:54 PM PST by unique_geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

If anything ever came of this the media would convince the sheeple that he got screwed and it would blow back on the Republicans. I’m certain for at aleast 2 news cycles all people would hear about is the Gov of Hawaii being BFF with Palin. It would quickly be portrayed as a racist conspiracy.


18 posted on 11/09/2008 2:31:33 PM PST by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sierrahome
It is not going to happen-—he’s a liberal and rules do not apply.

What rule says he has to show it to you just because you want to see it?

19 posted on 11/09/2008 2:34:10 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The US Supreme court doesn’t take being brushed off lightly.

Obama has until December 1st to respond to Berg's suit. It isn't a order by the court to produce a birth certificate. Obama's legal team will no doubt file a response that is almost identical to the one they filed in the lower court.

20 posted on 11/09/2008 2:37:11 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson