[hoosiermama]

Woo Hoo! (and thanks) That's what we've been waiting to see.....

I've been following this story partially for my 88 year old, retired attorney, father.
He's been saying since the beginning that the DNC needs to be charged. Berg definately has standing in filing grievance with them, and the others must be proven or disproven to carry this part of the case. Can't wait for him to read your post!

Again Woo Hoo!

[Calpernia]

For emphasis:

>>>He’s [father/attorney] been saying since the beginning that the DNC needs to be charged. Berg definately has standing in filing grievance with them, and the others must be proven or disproven to carry this part of the case. <<<

This filing were part of the initial Requests for Admissions filed on September 15, 2008.

The judge had no right to dismiss this and the news, what little that was covered, never said anything about this part. The State ELECs require the parties to do the initial vetting. So, as per their requirement, this is the correct path to take.