Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Intolerant in NJ; mnehrling

According to lawyers on an earlier thread there would be no damage, therefore no standing, before the election.


60 posted on 11/07/2008 7:07:38 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: hoosiermama
According to lawyers on an earlier thread there would be no damage, therefore no standing, before the election...interesting - it seems there were questions about McCain's citizenship and qualification to serve as Prez because he was born in Panama - having nothing to hide because he was born on a military base and thus qualified, McCain apparently produced the required documentation and the questions resolved - if this was a legitimate issue for McCain, it certainly would seem to be one that Obama should be required to answer, and the fact that he's stonewalling certainly should raise a red flag for any fair-minded citizen.......
295 posted on 11/07/2008 9:03:24 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: hoosiermama

That is right. I am not a lawyer (at least not yet) but I think the principle argument is that one cannot have general standing. However, the court has made an exception to this for taxpayer standing for violation of the establishment clause and I cannot see why something this serious cannot also serve as such an exception of generalized standing.


603 posted on 11/10/2008 7:07:47 AM PST by wrhssaxensemble (Piyush "Bobby" Jindal in 2012 after Obama makes an even bigger mess of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson