Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana
There is no precedence for disqualifying a president AFTER he has been elected...

If you read the decision by the judge that threw out Berg's lawsuit there is. Apparently it's the job of the electoral college to question and investigate eligibility. Or something along those lines.

51 posted on 10/28/2008 6:42:52 AM PDT by BubbaBasher (www.HypocriteLibs.org - Tracking the Slandering Liars in the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: BubbaBasher

There is no precedence for disqualifying a president AFTER he has been elected...

As in “It’s NEVER been done before”

I realize that the POTUS must be 35+ and BORN IN the US...

But no POTUS has been challenged on those grounds before...

SCOTUS time...

And Obama would win..


66 posted on 10/28/2008 7:23:29 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (McCain/Palin Now that's a ticket that deserves a tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson