Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Birth Certificate a "serious embarrassment" Source?
All the News that Fits ^ | 10/22/08 | Nancy

Posted on 10/22/2008 2:11:53 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-230 next last
To: aruanan
He is going to see Granny this week because the embarrassing news is going to come out that she is his mother. Not Stanley. He is going to tell her ahead of time.

This will make most of his history a lie, but he will indeed end up as eligible. He will jump 8 points in the polls.

121 posted on 10/22/2008 3:30:28 PM PDT by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: rlferny
The fact that he changed his name to a Muslim name later in life, which would automatically be construed as him accepting the Muslim faith.

You may be on to something there.

I knew of a family (didn't know them personally, but someone that I worked with did know them well) that became Muslim, and the father legally changed his name and the names of all the children to Muslim names. We've seen lots of sports figures do it, too.

After all the denials from Barry Dunham of never having been Muslim, a name change after adulthood would demonstrate what a liar he is. So what else is he hiding?

122 posted on 10/22/2008 3:30:56 PM PDT by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Nope, under the law prevailing at the time of his birth, his mother was too young to confer automatic citizenship on BHO if he was born outside the US, regardless of her marital status vis-a-vis the father. If he was born in Kenya he is not Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS.


123 posted on 10/22/2008 3:32:34 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (For real change stop electing lawyers: Fighter-Pilot/Hockey-Mom '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri

Which of the documents in there, specifically, mention the “serious embarrassment” wording? I’m not seeing it. Does that wording come from Berg or the Obama camp? .......

I’m not a lawyer so the best I can do is:

It comes from the Obama Camp

It is probably document 12 motion to dismiss or document 15 protective request.

It may be in referencing other cases that the terminology comes out.


124 posted on 10/22/2008 3:32:36 PM PDT by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Or maybe the middle name is really Steve.


125 posted on 10/22/2008 3:33:15 PM PDT by 4Godsoloved..Hegave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: plangent

Even if he is a bona fide bastard, that’s no big deal. We all know plenty of people who were born in similar circumstances.

Of course, his bastardy may not be an accident of birth. He could be a self-made man.


126 posted on 10/22/2008 3:33:16 PM PDT by oldfart (Obama nation = abomination. Think about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hang'emAll
I hope it means jail time for Dean and “O”

Agree. Worse than that we can expect real riots in the stree that will make 1968 looks pale in comparisson!!

127 posted on 10/22/2008 3:40:58 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TPOOH

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/15/

filing 15 mentions embarassment - but not as quoted


128 posted on 10/22/2008 3:44:43 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant; Calpernia; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; null and void; george76; Polarik; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...

Thanks, pissant.

Ping.


129 posted on 10/22/2008 3:47:54 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kralcmot

Hi. Yeah, I’ve been lurking on these threads and following along more or less. What I really don’t get is why a presidential candidate - any presidential candidate, going back to the early years of the nation - doesn’t have to prove to somebody or other, or some government agency or other - that he actually fulfills the constitutional requirements.

I suppose it’s because, thinking back on it, the issue has never come up before. I mean, Herbert Hoover, FDR, Truman, Ike, JFK, LBJ, RMN, Ford, Carter, Dutch, both Bushes and Bubba... they all had a very obvious paper trail going back to childhood. But, still, the mechanism should be in place on the government side, so that a private citizen doesn’t have to bother with this sort of lawsuit.

Do you see what I’m saying? I mean, why hasn’t the judiciary or congress jumped in on this? Don’t candidates have to file all sorts of papers and so on?


130 posted on 10/22/2008 3:54:43 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl
And even if he is, if he used an Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan, that would piss plenty of voters off enough to not vote for him. I haven’t researched it, but I have heard others say that Americans were prohibited from traveling to Pakistan during the time he went there. Is that true?

I found this by Google, no wonder Berg like to look at the stamps in Nobama's Passport:

*All this is evidence in Berg Lawsuit Against Obama

After the surprise story of Obama'sIslamic travels were leaked, The Obama campaign came out and confirmed all information, according to the report of Larry Rohter of April 10, 2008, in The New York Times.

After graduation from Occidental College, in 1981 Obama and his Muslim Pakistain roomate Wahid Hamid went down to the biggest Muslim populated countries. First, Indonesia, then onto Karachi, Pakistan and Hyderabad India, (BOTH HOTBEDS FOR RELIGIOUS TERMOIL & ISLAMIC RULE IN 70's & 80's. ISLAM JIHAD WAS RAMPANT) where Obama stayed with his Muslim friend, Mohammed Hasan Chandio.

Barack Obama used an Indonesian passport, which is granted ONLY to citizens in Indonesian and MUST be renewed every 3 years. That means Obama was still an Indonesian citizen, during his travel. By law in Indonesia, you can not apostasise (change religions), so Obama was still a Muslim at this time. * NOTE~ NO BAPTISM RECORD EVER FOUND ON OBAMA.

What is interesting to note is that Christians and U.S.

citizens were prohibitted from entering Pakistan during this time!!!

WHY YOU ASK?

Pakistan was in a turmoil during 70's & 80's because of dictatorship and the Afghanistan war.

In 1981 Pakistan was under Martial Law for fifth straight year. The entire country was under Sharia Islamic Law.

Pakistan was on the banned travel list for US Citizens at the time and all non-Muslim visitors were not welcome unless sponsored by their embassy for official business.

There would be only a few reasons a young Westerner of the Muslim faith would travel to Pakistan in 1981:

To Participate in Jihad, which is the duty of every ‘True Believer‘.

131 posted on 10/22/2008 4:08:24 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
Don’t you have to show a BC when you get married?

A quick check shows that in Illinois, no BC is required unless you are under 18.

132 posted on 10/22/2008 4:09:54 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

I don’t think he looks like either of them. But I do see the Dunham bloodline.


133 posted on 10/22/2008 4:10:23 PM PDT by Gemsbok (Fight voter FRAUD (Acorn)(Obama) and be a poll worker or observer: Beat them at their own game!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: pissant
MICHAEL SAVAGE IS BREAKING THE BERG LAWSUIT!
October 22, 2008 on his Web page and Radio
Main Street Media embarassed about missing this opportunity as they thought Barry was a nice guy with nothing to hide.
Why IS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA really Headed to Hawaii
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573

134 posted on 10/22/2008 4:12:27 PM PDT by ncfool (Obama stands for The New United Socialist State or "TNUSSA")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Two Kids' Dad

Yeah, where’s the RNC equivalent of “Deep Throat”??


135 posted on 10/22/2008 4:13:26 PM PDT by Gemsbok (Fight voter FRAUD (Acorn)(Obama) and be a poll worker or observer: Beat them at their own game!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The Courts can't play politics and the Judge has been shown the various precedents in the lawsuit. Berg and us as US Citizens have a RIGHT to know if we're voting for a Qualified Person for President.

I don't give a flip if it embarrasses Barry. He knew the truth and he hid the truth and he deserves to be embarrassed. Look at his behavior to obtain the Senate Seat in Illinois. Did he even give a care to the men whose Sealed Divorce Agreements he had opened and publicized?

What goes around, comes around. Karma has caught up with Barry Dunham Soetoro, the rich white kid playing a middle-class black kid, poorly.

136 posted on 10/22/2008 4:14:16 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (All You Need is Money [Soros] and a Candidate Who Can Be Coached to Look Sincere [Obama]. A. Huxley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
I can't find the words or phrases to describe how I feel that he is backed so many, even at the highest levels of government.

When you see the Clintons, playing it "safe" are pretending campaigning for him, that should raise a warning flag!!!

137 posted on 10/22/2008 4:14:31 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
I guess it would be an EMBARRASSMENT to be found ineligible to serve as president, after repeated denials.

"...would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC."

I guess RICO and significant jail time for 0bama and DNC leaders would count as a "a defined and serious injury"...

138 posted on 10/22/2008 4:16:31 PM PDT by null and void (Socialism doesn't work because of people./People don't work because of socialism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Forgive my ignorance, but why has this come to a lawsuit? Isn’t it an absolute, written-in-stone requirement of all candidates for president that they prove they’re eligible for the office according to the restrictions set out in the constitution?

Apparently not. One would think so, but I don't think a candidate about whom there was any question has ever refused to provide such proof. Not that there have been many. There certainly haven't been any with a foreign father, a mother still a teenager, who lived for several of his formative years in a foreign country with a foreign stepfather, and who magically was able to travel to a foreign country, which was not allowing anything but "official" travel into the country by Americans. Well you get the picture.

The requirement to be natural born was put in there to avoid potential foreign loyalties and influences upon the President. The Anointed One certainly has such influence, gobs and gobs of it. When it was written, it would have virtually impossible for the son of Foreign citizen *father* to be a natural born citizen, unless he was born on US soil, and in some situations, not even then.

139 posted on 10/22/2008 4:18:13 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
His middle name is really: Jihad.

j/k

He was Barack J Obama, on several web sites that google let slip during its 10 year anniversary...

140 posted on 10/22/2008 4:19:29 PM PDT by null and void (Socialism doesn't work because of people./People don't work because of socialism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson