Posted on 10/12/2008 11:17:22 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
Typical liberal response... Get mad at those who are angry at Obama palling around with terrorists (Bill Ayers).
Instead, liberals should be directing their anger at Obama palling around with Bill Ayers.
*** It's hard for people to be angry at Barack Obama's palling around with Bill Ayers if Obama had never palled around with Bill Ayers in the first place. ***
So, who's responsible for the anger in all of this?
Obama.
He palled around with Ayers - and no one forced him to, either - so he is and always will be to blame for the anger at him palling around with Bill Ayers.
This is how to call liberals on this:
It’s hard for people to be angry at Obama palling around with Bill Ayers, if Obama had never palled around with Bill Ayers in the first place.
So, are they saying that Obama broke into Ayers’s home and held a fund-raiser against his and his terrorist wife’s will?
As Rush Limbaugh pointed out, Barack Obama and Osama bin Laden have at least one thing in common...both had acquaintances with people who bombed The Pentagon.
McCain is scared because Odinga is black. But he needs to get over it. But we can spread the word. Ya know like through internet, e-mail.
Obama campaigned for Raila Odinga (Orange Party Marxist)- illegally(because he is a sitting senator).
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=S8QcpdUtxNQ
“President Mwai Kibaki’s government accused rival Raila Odinga’s party of unleashing “genocide” in Kenya on Wednesday as the death toll from tribal violence over a disputed election passed 300.”
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL277107920080102
More fun from the rumor mill:
Read the last blog comment from the Scottish bint.
It’ll make you gag.
No, liberals/Dems are acting as if Americans have no right to be angry at Obama kicking off his Illinois Senate career in Ayers living room and palling around with him even when he knew that he was a domestic terrorist.
It was common knowledge in Chicago about Ayers, yet we are supposed to believe Obama’s BS about him not knowing Ayers was a terrorist.
Ayers: former terrorist? Can someone be a former murderer?
They think that Obama should be able to pall around with Rev. Wright, Ayers, Khalidi, Meeks, Rezko, an so on, and you and me and everyone else - we should not be angry at this.
They think that Obama should be able to pall around with whatever societal reject, loser, freak and so on that he wants to - and no one should say a word about it.
So, Michelle Obama apparently had a gut feeling about this.
Are wives usually right about such things?
You mean this one?...
Firstly I cant imagine anyone not wanting to have an affair with this man !he is fantastic!and really who cares even if he had!with all the affairs and scandals in Americas politics over the years is it important?Whayt i cant understand is why America is undecided between Obama and MacCain!!?no contest whatsoever !watched the debates between the two men and Obama was so far ahead in everything!MacCain and the lipstick woman ?i would be afraid very afraid!!!
- Christine, Glasgow Scotland, 12/10/2008 10:01
You don't think "Christine" is really this guy do you?
I think the proper word to use is “associate”.
But then, as another FReeper posted recently:
"Nobody gives a hoot about Africa. Odinga, obinga,,nobody cares. Nobody would even care if it were proved that Obama went to a cannibal banquet."27 posted on Thursday, October 09, 2008 6:40:19 AM by John Valentine
I don’t know but he sure seems the “type”.
To me, he’s just a tanner, even more amoral Bubba.
Wouldn’t surprise me but IMO, I’d swallow cyanide before I’d touch The Evil One.
Her adoration is rather Stephen King-esque.
She’d be Nadine Cross to his Randall Flagg.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.