Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Denied National Security Clearance
SecurePuter.com ^ | Oct 3, 2008 | unknown

Posted on 10/03/2008 6:12:41 PM PDT by Bulldawg Fan

Barack Obama cannot be Trusted with Classified Information

How can the President of the United States be denied a basic security clearance? How can the Commander and Chief of the most powerful military be denied access to classified information? Barack Obama would be denied the necessary security clearance for President if he was held to the same standard as everyone else. If you can’t pass a Secret level background investigation, which is required for many soldiers, you should not be eligible for the Presidency.

What is a Security Clearance?

Having served in the U.S. military, law enforcement, and as a civilian government contractor, I’ve had my fair share of background investigations. The United States government employs a multitier security clearance paradigm.

(Excerpt) Read more at secureputer.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: indictmentofobama
This is a long but devestating indictment of Hussien Obama's fitness to be Commander in Chief. It details his weaknesses throughout his campaign pertaining to national security as well as many comments made by his wife that would compromise national security. Please dont elect this Marxist couple. We may never recover.
1 posted on 10/03/2008 6:12:41 PM PDT by Bulldawg Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

BETWEEN THE ILLEGAL DONATIONS AND THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE
MAYBE TIME TO FREEP THE FEC

How to Contact the Office of Inspector General:
Call Mail
1-202-694-1015 Federal Election Commission
1-800-424-9530 Office of Inspector General
Fax 999 E Street, NW
1-202-501-8134 Room 940
E-mail Washington, DC 20463
oig@fec.gov

How to Contact the Federal Election Commission:
Call Mail
1-800-424-9530 Federal Election Commission
1-202-694-1100 (Washington, DC) 999 E Street, NW
1-202-219-3336 (Hearing Impaired) Washington, DC 20463


2 posted on 10/03/2008 6:13:22 PM PDT by mouse1 (McCain Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan
In the 1960’s, Obama couldn't get clearance delivering the mail. Oh my! How far we've come! May God save us!
3 posted on 10/03/2008 6:19:35 PM PDT by appleharvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: appleharvey

Obama shouldn’t be in charge of a janitorial service that employs 2.


4 posted on 10/03/2008 6:21:49 PM PDT by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

All I can say is Americans voted a draft dodger to be Commander in Chief of the military in 1992/6. I NEVER connected to that vote either. Obama is even worse. Rush is even now admitting that IGNORANCE is going to be our downfall.


5 posted on 10/03/2008 6:24:29 PM PDT by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

Bookmarked.


6 posted on 10/03/2008 6:24:48 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan
A big security problem with first line relatives in foreign countries is that said relatives could be kidnapped and held hostage. The American relative would have to choose between the life of his brother, grandmother, cousin etc and doing what the kidnappers demanded. Maybe not a problem for Obama since we know he already threw one grandmother under the bus. However, I know people who have been denied security clearance for this reason alone even though they were otherwise outstanding Americans!
7 posted on 10/03/2008 6:25:13 PM PDT by cotton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan
If McLaim don't mention this he is a FOOL..
O'bama cannot pass a top secret test.. or much much less of a clearance than that..
8 posted on 10/03/2008 6:34:46 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

The time is now that the McCain campaign add this narative to their campaign, ads everywhere.I’ve long asked myself the same question. How could Odumbo even get a top security clearance the commander and chief requires? He would never get it.

Heck. I’m a cabinet maker by trade and even had to submit to an FBI background check just to put cabinets in the local FBI branches new building for cryin’ out loud.

Look at the stuff Clinton regretaby gave to China. Myself I shudder to think about Odumbo with even the responsiblities as just a senator.


9 posted on 10/03/2008 6:45:50 PM PDT by diverteach (http://foolishpleasurestudio.com/eyewool/slap_hillary.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

The form you fill out for a SECRET or a TOP SECRET clearance is called an SF-86.

Some agencies have you do it on paper, others have you do it electronically.

You can Google SF-86 to see one in PDF format; if you want to try filling out the electronic one, Google the term “EPSQ”.

You download an application that looks as if it was written in Delphi or PARADOX. And then the fun starts.

You have the option to print the e-version out after you satisfactorily fill it out, and it self-audits for missing information, gaps in employment, and so forth.

Mine when printed out, was about twenty pages long; after doing one, I’ve always kept a copy because that way I have anything and everything that could possibly be asked on a job application in one place. (It took me about a week of research to find all the information they wanted.)

And just in case you’re interested, yes, I got my clearance.


10 posted on 10/03/2008 6:49:51 PM PDT by George Smiley (Palin is the real deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

Does anyone have the results of the Fox News VP debate poll? I understand there were 11 million responders?


11 posted on 10/03/2008 6:53:20 PM PDT by nikos1121 (Obama-Biden Where's the beef?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton
A big security problem with first line relatives in foreign countries is that said relatives could be kidnapped and held hostage. The American relative would have to choose between the life of his brother, grandmother, cousin etc and doing what the kidnappers demanded. Maybe not a problem for Obama since we know he already threw one grandmother under the bus. However, I know people who have been denied security clearance for this reason alone even though they were otherwise outstanding Americans!

I don't know to what extent things have changed, but my father got top secret clearance in the '60's/'70's despite the fact that his parents and siblings lived in East Germany and I had no trouble getting a secret clearance in the '80's despite having grandparents and aunts and uncles and cousins in East Germany, and also admitting to having smoked pot. My fathers company was manufacturing critical components for electronic countermeasure systems for our fighters and bombers. The operational frequencies and the designs were classified. (if you knew the frequencies they operated at they could conceivably have been made ineffective, negating a HUGE advantage that American aircraft had).

12 posted on 10/03/2008 7:02:37 PM PDT by free_for_now (No Dick Dale in the R&R HOF? - for shame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: diverteach

Years ago, as an Army wife I had to complete forms for a security clearance on at least two occasions - once when we were assigned overseas duty and again when my hero was selected for Command and General Staff school.


13 posted on 10/03/2008 7:15:00 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (speak true, right wrong, follow the King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

The President of the United States, in addition, to having access to standard classified information, i.e. Secret and Top-Secret, would also, I suspect, have virtually unlimited access to what are known as Special Access Programs (SAPS). These are highly compartmented programs that are run by various agencies of the government.

The requirements for being cleared for information in a SAP is far more stringent than being cleared for “straight vanilla” Secret and Top Secret informaton.

Individuals are routinely denied access to SAPs whose Background Investigation have revealed various kinds of questionable activity such as prior use of drugs, current or prior association with anyone individual or group deemed to be disloyal to the United States, serious financial or credit problems, or any previous activity that would subject the individual to possible blackmail or coercion.


14 posted on 10/03/2008 7:20:43 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

Has he been denied? Or is this article making a suggestion he couldn’t be based on his many relationships and ties to certain people or family members.


15 posted on 10/03/2008 7:34:28 PM PDT by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

Has he been denied? Or is this article making a suggestion he couldn’t be based on his many relationships and ties to certain people or family members.


16 posted on 10/03/2008 7:34:28 PM PDT by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
IGNORANCE

I think it's STUPIDITY.

17 posted on 10/03/2008 7:39:13 PM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley
Yes sir, it took me about three weeks to complete mine, and then I had to transcribe all of it into a Marine Corps data base. This clearance was up to and including Secret (miniscule compared to POTUS). With all the information they want, I can’t believe Obama (with his questionable associations and family history) even has a chance of being considered. Of course there’s a chance I could be dead-wrong.
18 posted on 10/03/2008 8:10:27 PM PDT by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SpookBrat

I’m not casting aspersions on the original poster, but I understand that members of Congress automatically are granted TOP SECRET.

This was a real bitch when Ron Dellums was in Congress:

From Wikipedia:

Partisan affiliations

Though he ran as a Democrat, and Caucused as a Democrat in Congress, Dellums describes himself as a Socialist. In the 1970s, Dellums was a member of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee (DSOC), an offshoot of the Socialist Party of America. He later became vice-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA),[9] which was formed by a merger between the DSOC and the New American Movement, and which works within and outside the Democratic Party. As of 2006, Dellums is no longer a vice-chair of the DSA.

While running for mayor of Oakland, Dellums was registered as a member of the Democratic party.[46][12] All city offices in Oakland

U.S. House Committee positions

Dellums served as chairman of the House Committee on the District of Columbia and the House Armed Services Committee.

Dellums also served on the Foreign Affairs Committee, the Post Office and Civil Service Committee, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Select Committee to Investigate the Intelligence Community.[24]


19 posted on 10/03/2008 9:45:11 PM PDT by George Smiley (Palin is the real deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

interesting ping


20 posted on 10/03/2008 11:26:31 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson