Polarik, looks some others have noted what you have.
ONe thing that the article failed to mention is that you can retain the Exif data if you so desire.
We are way beyond the point of saying that FactCheck and everyone with whom they are associated, are NOT idiots with a camera. They know EXACTLY what they are doing.
The vaunted Israel Insider passed it off as "incompetence" on their part, but, and here's a preview, FactCheck did quite a bot of forging of their own, on the photos they took. Do people really beleive that FactCheck was NOT paying attention to what I was finding over the past three to four months? Do they think that it was a coincidence that they specifically tried to dismiss my research in their article with the same, WRONG answers? Ah, no. They have been very diligent in learning what NOT to show in their photographs. "Pixel halos," as they intentionally called them, was the first challenge for them to Photoshop away. But, I've got so much more to tell. It's just finding the time to do it.