I couldn't resist.
To: Owl_Eagle
2 posted on
09/17/2008 9:19:56 AM PDT by
mpackard
(Read my Lip-Stick)
To: Owl_Eagle
You are right. Everyone stop searching, keep our traffic rankings high. :->
3 posted on
09/17/2008 9:20:33 AM PDT by
mnehring
(Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
To: Owl_Eagle
Preach it Brother!!
Amen!!
Luke, use the search......
To: Owl_Eagle
I think this might have been posted already-:)
5 posted on
09/17/2008 9:20:46 AM PDT by
icwhatudo
(VIEW THE PALIN VIDEO http://www.overstream.net/view.php?oid=n1ronxelmtin)
To: Owl_Eagle
thanks a lot. You made me laugh out loud, which woke up the sleeping baby in my lap. Oh well, it was worth it.
6 posted on
09/17/2008 9:20:56 AM PDT by
mockingbyrd
(I am Sarah Palin. Her story is my story.)
To: Owl_Eagle
Now you just outted yourself as a FR dork!
(I’m still laughing, btw)
7 posted on
09/17/2008 9:21:48 AM PDT by
netmilsmom
(An Obama win? Move to AK, secede, drill, drill, drill!!!!!!)
To: Owl_Eagle
Search has been broken for months, if not a year or more.
It takes about 24 hours for Search to cache the results and report them correctly.
In fact, this site has become so hopelessly broken that I'm thinking about starting a new thread about it.
8 posted on
09/17/2008 9:22:18 AM PDT by
KayEyeDoubleDee
(const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
To: Owl_Eagle
I have often wondered about posting to people that have double posted as wasting bandwidth. Isn’t the one posting to the double poster, also wasting bandwidth?
9 posted on
09/17/2008 9:23:32 AM PDT by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Republicans and Conservatives staying home will give us President Hussein Obama.)
To: Owl_Eagle
More often than not, the search function does NOT work as advertised though. THAT’s the problem. Heck,when I type in a title of a thread that I know exists (from a few days back), it still usually gives me a “no match found” message.
10 posted on
09/17/2008 9:23:36 AM PDT by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: Owl_Eagle
thanks, for the tips.
11 posted on
09/17/2008 9:24:25 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
("Annoy the media, elect PALIN and McCAIN....errr....McCAIN / PALIN.....MCPALIN" 8^)
To: Owl_Eagle
Why would consolidating 3 separate conversations into one longer thread cut down on traffic? I don’t see any basis for this statement.
Perhaps instead we should institute a comment and page view cap for each thread to make sure to keep traffic down.
12 posted on
09/17/2008 9:25:02 AM PDT by
sbMKE
To: Owl_Eagle
vanity, vanity, all is vanity
13 posted on
09/17/2008 9:25:49 AM PDT by
devane617
(Fish died on his Harley when he hit a camel at dusk.)
To: Owl_Eagle
15 posted on
09/17/2008 9:27:20 AM PDT by
TexasNative2000
(Obviously, liberals can't handle a strong, independent woman.)
To: Owl_Eagle
ROFL ... and did you know that 67% of statistics are made up right on the spot? 83% agree.
22 posted on
09/17/2008 11:05:46 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(don't worry, they only want to take water out of the other guy's side of the bucket.)
To: Owl_Eagle
It doesn't always work, unfortunately. I find using keywords to be more reliable. Many many times I've done title searches that returned nothing only to find the same story later posted earlier with the same title.
* shrugs *
23 posted on
09/17/2008 11:06:47 AM PDT by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: Owl_Eagle
Study Reveals Simple "Search" Could Reduce Traffic on FreeRepublic by 38% Let's see, if I already know the title of the article, that would mean that I've already read it and don't need to reread it, SO the search function isn't needed at all.
Just think how much faster FR will be after removing the search function, in fact, a study I just concluded shows that a hugh improvement that will stun your beeber will follow the removal of said search function!
24 posted on
09/17/2008 11:17:33 AM PDT by
RJL
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson