Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Thoughts? Comments?
1 posted on 09/15/2008 12:39:26 PM PDT by SilvieWaldorfMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Only if they’re Republicans.


2 posted on 09/15/2008 12:41:24 PM PDT by caper gal 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Bankon it... nothing even one-tenth as rigorous was done to vet Obama.


3 posted on 09/15/2008 12:42:45 PM PDT by SMARTY ('At some point you get tired of swatting flies, and you have to go for the manure heap' Gen. LeMay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Good point!

Someone (Obama) is running for President, who would not be able to get a job as an entry-level computer technician at my company — because he would not pass the background check!


4 posted on 09/15/2008 12:44:57 PM PDT by atomicweeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Elected positions are not subject to approval by the FBI. Think about how scary a world that would be.


5 posted on 09/15/2008 12:45:27 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

As Savage noted last week, based on Obama’s long-term association with known domestic terrorists he would be unlikely to pass the background check to work for the FBI.


7 posted on 09/15/2008 12:50:44 PM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
Aren't presidential and V.P. noms supposed to be rigorously investigated?

Under what controlliong legal authority?

8 posted on 09/15/2008 12:50:47 PM PDT by Roccus (Some day it'll all make sense.......................maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
Office of Personnel Management. They do background checks for clearances.
11 posted on 09/15/2008 12:54:41 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Robert Byrd - Ex community organizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
A person accepting a government job is sworn in and part of this swearing in went I swear to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America so help me God. I guess if you do not believe in God you are not bound.
13 posted on 09/15/2008 12:56:59 PM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

To answer your question, no, they are not. They are also given NIE briefings once they are nominated.


14 posted on 09/15/2008 12:57:35 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Robert Byrd - Ex community organizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
Aren't presidential and V.P. noms supposed to be rigorously investigated?

It is possible to do that on age, natural-born citizenship and residency only. Any other restrictions would require a constitutional amendment.

15 posted on 09/15/2008 12:58:43 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
Read “Unlimited Access” by former FBI Agent Gary Aldrich.

It details in depth, his experiences in attempting to get the Clinton White House staff to comply with the law and undergo the required scrutiny for security clearance processing and approval/denial.

Most of them either completely blew him off, or flatly refused.

Neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton ever complied while he was there (they did eventually run him off), and he goes into great detail how, knowing what had at that time become public knowledge about them (Bill's unexplained foreign travel [6 months in Moscow], his flat refusal to release his medical records, persistent reports of heavy drug use while in office in Ark., Whitewater, philandering, her allegded complicity in several S&L failures, etc.), if he had been able to apply the normal standards for processing a clearance request, neither would have qualified for even a Confidential level security clearance.

However, officials elected to the Senate and Executive Office are granted clearance by virtue of their positions, as well as selected members of their staffs.

Sad, but true.

16 posted on 09/15/2008 12:59:16 PM PDT by conservativeharleyguy (Technically, we are all Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
Hi Silvie! Caught you on Chris' show this morning...

It's scandalous that our elected officials are allowed to bypass the kinds of security checks that we common folk must be subject to. Remember Senator Leahy (aka Senator Depends)? Leahy acknowledged inadvertently leaking a confidential Senate Intelligence Committee report, apologized and resigned from the committee. There are two other reports from the 1980s, which allege that he inadvertently disclosed classified intelligence information in one case and threatened to do so in another.

17 posted on 09/15/2008 1:01:32 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama wants to raise taxes and kill babies; Palin wants to raise babies and kill taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
"Is there any reason that you would think or make you believe that this person would not be loyal to the Government of the United States of America?"

I thought you were going to say, "Well, he does have Obama signs in his front yard."

19 posted on 09/15/2008 1:08:28 PM PDT by AZLiberty (You can't power the U.S. economy on Democrat snake oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD
After serving in Vietname, one of my brothers classmates from gradeschool applied for a job in the secret service.

He listed my father as a reference.

They came to visit my father and interviewed him for over an hour.

They they did a background check on my father.

21 posted on 09/15/2008 1:16:34 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. FReerepublic,com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

“She came to my door, showed her badge and paper work, and I invited her in.”

Sounds like a juicy novella. LOL!


22 posted on 09/15/2008 1:16:52 PM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Obama is protected from close scrutiny by an inherited characteristic, and because he’s a democrat.


26 posted on 09/15/2008 1:34:06 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (liberalism = serious mental deficiency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

My OPR investigation took place from August 2007 to February 2008. Had to get a full background done for my position with DHS/ICE. My investigator let me know just how much fun he had asking the neighbors about me, especially when he went across the street and told the lady who answered the door, “The gentleman who lives in that house is being investigated for a job with Department of Homeland Security, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement,” and she said to him “Immagracion?” (sp - no, I’m not sure how to spell it in Espanol)

It’s a houseful of illegals - about 12 of them in the house. They don’t even walk by the house anymore.


27 posted on 09/15/2008 2:03:31 PM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (A prayer's as good as bayonet on a day like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

The standards utilized to clear hired and appointed officials within our government sadly do not apply to elected officials. I had a friend with the DIS who claimed to be part of the processing of President Clinton’s security clearance - according to him a non-elected official would not have been granted an (S) much less a (TS). All rumor of course, discussions over beer hardly count as verifiable stories - but the point was true - background checks and clearances for elected officials are simply formalities and the records of such investigations can not be made public - exempt from FOIA.


35 posted on 09/15/2008 5:09:53 PM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Uh, the requirements to be President are spelled out in the Constitution. A background check isn’t one of them.

I do remember however the police chief chief in Chicago at the time commenting after Harold Washington was elected Mayor that “ I can’t be seen in public with him, I’m not allowed to associate with known felons”. Too sweet.


37 posted on 09/15/2008 5:13:09 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Has McCain been vetted? He’s surely the Manchurian Candidate. //S//


41 posted on 09/16/2008 4:45:23 AM PDT by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson