[library user]

Wonder if the NY Times has enough balls to re-run this on their home page TODAY. *crickets*

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

If the NY Times cared about ratings, they would have featured Ayers today, or even tomorrow. But they’re too agenda driven.

[Cyclone59]

bump

[Vineyard]

If the NY Times ran the article, they might make even more egregious modifications/changes to the article to make it even more biased than the original article.

From the original article: After the couple surfaced, Ms. Dohrn tried to practice law, taking the bar exam in New York. But she was turned down by the Bar Association's character committee because of her political activities.

The NY Slimes could have more accurately written: "But she was turned down by the Bar Association's character committee because she was a CONVICTED FELON (who therefore had no respect for the law!!!)

That would be more accurate than suggesting that the Bar Association made a nasty partisan political decision.