[ken21]

so why doesn’t this get legs on the national media?

[PGalt]

OUTSTANDING post! Thank you, Polarik. Another layer of deception exposed.

Fact Check? Annenberg? Obama? WorldWide(Spider)Web. My apologies to spiders.

[Dajjal]

All I can say is ..... Merci, beaucoup!

[Mr. K]

mega- BUMP

but lets wait to make sure hilLIARy is not in the wings...

[kimmie7]

Donnie??

Is that you, Donnie???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNfBF2xvhaE

[Jet Jaguar]

BTTT

[mnehring]

Is there any real surprise, FactCheck.org is owned by the Annenberg Foundation, run by Obama supporters and funders.

[Jet Jaguar]

BTTT

[sinanju]

Then there’s this little matter of the font being wholly inappropriate to the era.

Exactly what or who is the authority to whom presidential candidates must present proof that they are qualified to run for the office?

[igoramus08]

“The document we looked at did have a certificate number; it is 151 1961 - 010641.” - http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

Can you do FOI request on the Obama’s certificate number for all the details in the birth certificate?

[tcrlaf]

There is a VERY simple way to get this solved.

Present it to a federal court, Like the one Clinton loon Phil Berg has filed in, for verification.

Obama could have laid this to rest, LONG AGO, and hasn’t. Where there’s smoke, there is usually fire...

[Polarik]

I meant to say:

"Conversely, the border on the right side..."

[autumnraine]

Want to read this later.

[2ndDivisionVet]

FactCheck is affiliated and funded by the Annenberg Project. Former Weatherman terrorist Professor Bill Ayers and Senator Barack Obama worked together at the Annenberg Foundation. Coincidence? Yeah, right!

http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2008/04/re-the-bill-aye.html

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

[Rushmore Rocks]

Thanks, Polarik. You are intrepid and awesome.

Lucy, can you handle one more for your ping list?

[newzjunkey]

“Fact Check” is linked to the Obama campaign and thus has NO credibility.

[tefis]

Um...why are we wracking our brains for insight into the factcheck photos of the purported BC? How about the fact that it’s a photo, shot at a distance at an angle, and not a high res scan? Not even a close up photo of the doc is shown. The photos of the signature and seal shot in separate photos and not shown on the doc. They could be from anything. Where’s a scan?

By using photos, they are preventing analysis by doc examiners. The left is always doing whatever they can for plausible deniability...even if it’s implausible. If Obama had a certified copy of his BC, he would be shoving it down out rightwing throats with a B-52. But he’s not. The absence of a high res scan of the complete doc precludes the need for any further analysis..

[LucyT]

Thanks, Polarik and Rushmore Rocks.

Ping.

Please FRmail to be added or removed.

[Red Steel]

Good to see that you’re still on the job. :-)

[bossmechanic]

Ya know, I’d be real happy if the technogeek squad (that has been working on this for a year now) could continue casting doubt on BO’s methical origins. But it is equally useful to expose the Annenberg foundation factcheck scam and connection to BO and Ayers. Charge on ladies and gents. May God be with you.