Alrighty then, I can see by that statement that discussion with you is useless.
I don't think so, but if that is the case, then my attitude got quite hardened during shamnesty last year. I see that as the prototype for the kind of fight we'd have on our hands every minute of the next four years if McCain were our President. He'd propose 'maverick' solutions to try to get a legacy in a single Presidential term, knowing that his natural allies are Democrats. We narrowly avoided shamnesty because we managed to convince conservative Republicans to buck an unpopular President, and we also worked on newly-elected Blue Dog Democrats who don't back their party's moonbat ideas.
Would it really be that much worse if we had Obama looking like he was going to win big in the fall, scaring the pants off of red state voters, and causing them to replace the D's with some R's, just to keep from paying reparations? We'd be able to ask staunch conservative and liberal RINO alike to oppose every part of the Obama programs.
Bolstered by email campaigns, we'd stuff a backbone into the US Senate with every liberal nominee that Barry sends up. All we have to do is show the American public what he really wants to do for two years. I'm confident we'll get Congress back in 2010, like we did in 1994. And the best thing is, the person who is most effective at saving this country from a liberal agenda is the one who should be our nominee in 2012. Let Obambi deal with Hillary in his own party, and our new champion showing what American policy should look like, let him be the one who gets the blame for the coming housing crisis, and we will be on top again, with real leaders that conservatives can be proud of, not ones we have to hold our noses to vote for.