A little somthing I whipped up this afternoon. After reading about another beating in NY by white supremecists and the black victim charged I had to write it out to let out my anger.
To: mainestategop
Quanell X...has been a staunch opponent against the castle doctrine calling it racistThe Castle Doctrine interferes with Q's livelihood and that of his constituents and is therefore Unconstitutional or unfair or discriminatory or something.
2 posted on
08/12/2008 1:53:11 PM PDT by
arthurus
To: mainestategop
You need to work on your use of quotation marks: as it stands, you’re the one making racist comments about White... which I assume wasn’t your intention.
3 posted on
08/12/2008 2:21:43 PM PDT by
Grut
To: mainestategop
Everyone over the age of 18, with the exception of convicted felons, should be allowed to carry a concealed weapon.
The TeenyBoppers would have had knowledge that Mr White "could" have had a gun and would have had the RIGHT to use it to defend himself and his property. And so they would have either had no excuse OR they would have thought it over and decided threats were not in order without solid facts.
I'm an unusual woman in that I believe in concealed carry for everyone. In fact, I think we should be able to wear our guns "where all the world can see" instead of having to conceal them.
Back in the day, that's what 'we' did. And those not allowed to carry a gun . . . if caught committing a crime with a gun and convicted on DNA or absolute evidence . . . could lose their trigger finger. Kind of like the days of yore when archers lost their middle finger.
The sign of "victory" would not be the protruding middle finger, it would be the pointer-trigger finger.
What say you?
4 posted on
08/12/2008 2:22:46 PM PDT by
HighlyOpinionated
(The World is a Tragedy for Those Who Feel (Democrats) but a Comedy to Those Who Think (Republicans).)
To: mainestategop
The right to self-defense comes from within our nature. No government, even the most fascist, can take it away from us. Even if they make laws forbidding it, the laws are invalid and not binding on one’s conscience.
If a scum breaks into your house at night and threatens your spouse and family, they want us to say to the scum “welcome to my house. rape the women, kill the men, shoot the children. I’m a good liberal”.
What I have to say to liberal lawgivers can’t be written here in any form at all.
5 posted on
08/12/2008 2:50:34 PM PDT by
BooksForTheRight.com
(Fight liberal lies with knowledge. Read conservative books and articles.)
To: mainestategop
"...the attackers turned out to be Afro-Latino." Just a footnote on this one. Both of these miscreants were career criminals in this country illegally. Mr. Horn gave the perps one opportunity "FREEZE" before opening fire which both men chose to ignore.
7 posted on
08/12/2008 3:20:07 PM PDT by
Desron13
(If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
To: mainestategop
It’s not “epitaph” it’s “epithet.” An “epitaph” is what you have carved on your tombstone. Common mistake.
11 posted on
08/13/2008 7:41:45 AM PDT by
ichabod1
(If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it, and if it stops moving, subsidize it.)
To: mainestategop
Growing up in school I was told that I had to get a teacher if I was being assaulted by another student. If I fought back, I would get punished as well. A friend of mine who went to a rough school in the south had it worse. If he fought back, he got punished and the assailant either got away or got a slap on the wrist. The teachers will usually ignore it. Also, the teachers would tell you that nobody liked a "tattle-tale". So you couldn't defend yourself, and you couldn't go to the teacher.
12 posted on
08/13/2008 9:37:43 AM PDT by
chesley
( Ya can't make chick'n dumplin's outta chick'n feathers!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson