My thinking exactly.
It brings us to the incredible concept of fake but accurate, the DR defense.
The Clinton impeachment wasn’t about perjury or not, it was about voting along party lines.
Obama’s history is full of missing, contradictory, or conflicted documents, that he selectively ignores.
Here is a You-tube video that is a nice expose of Obama’s thought. Maybe you’ve seen it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI77cU3jsFs
I’m sorry that a fake CLB is about as interesting as a fake dollar bill. Yes, there is a crime here, but the MSM won’t give it airplay. He’s missing a thesis on nuclear disarmament. He’s an Egotist, a racist, and things like Disowning Reverent White are taken as signs of maturity.
The fact there was a single superscript ‘th’ in the Dan Rather document should have been enough to stop that whole scenario from even getting CBS airplay, a character nonexistent on typewriters of the era. But no, it went on into the fake but accurate category. So it is with the birth certificate. Given the bland ‘So What?” by the MSM, and their 99% support of Obama, we can know it is phony but it gets us nowhere. To the average Democrat, it is inconceivable their messiah would have a phony birth certificate but anyone who besmirches him needs to be put in his place.
Even on this forum, you don’t dare describe him for what he is, polite discourse only.
Why are people so afraid this time around??? A relative told me he gave up on FR and posting here because FR was losing it's bite, tenacity, honesty, whatever you want to call it. It only takes a head line that includes the words "Obama" or "COLB" for FR members to post "yawn....". I'd bet you dollars to donuts that poster didn't even bother to go to the link. I'm glad members of FR back in '03 made the effort, had the curiosity, technical expertise, etc. to make a difference.