Posted on 07/16/2008 6:23:42 AM PDT by big black dog
Ronald Reagans 11th commandment is as sacred as the first 10 Thou shalt not speak ill of any other republican. Yes, moderates and right wingers can have our healthy disagreements. That makes us an intellectually stronger party than the democrats, which do not allow for dissenting views from the party orthodoxy (Joe Lieberman anyone?). However, we must not question each others motives. We are not liberals. We do not cannibalize each other, since we need every one of us to govern.
As a Jewish republican, I have always thought of republicans as the Jews of politics. Everybody outside of us hates our guts, and even those inside our group are often angst ridden, hand wringing, guilt ridden and self loathing. Wow, that sounds like Jews to me. Republicans and Jews would both be better off if instead of begging our many enemies to like us, we just told them (Syria, Iran, Moveon.org, Jason Blair Times) to go (insert bad word here) themselves. Those plotting our demise will fail. We need to stay strong as republicans and govern.
Yes, the goal is to govern. There are no moral victories. Yes, the republicans in congress in 2006 needed a wake up call. That is fine. Congress is not the White House, and never will be (Nancy Damascus Pelosi anyone?). The reasons liberals cant govern is because they blackmail normal democrats into veering hard left in order to be palatable to their fringe elements.
My blog deliberately refuses to write about red meat social issues, such as abortion, gay marriage, and immigration. I have not taken a public position on the immigration bill, and my blog is officially neutral on the issue. I will simply say that while there are some right wing bigots in this world, not all people on the right who want to protect our borders are guilty of brown bashing. They believe our laws are being violated, and simply want to enforce the rule of law. Also, the moderates that are not as riled up about illegal immigration are not democrats or even republicrats. Wall Street is filled with staunch republicans that focus more on economic issues. Criticizing someone for not sharing your passions on every issue is counterproductive when they might be your ally on most other issues. We cannot act like liberals. We have to be tolerant of each other. This does not mean embrace views we find wrongheaded, but it means not questioning the motives of our fellow republicans for holding such views.
Ronald Reagan united people because everybody wanted to be on his side. They all thought he agreed with them, when it was they who agreed with him. No matter how fiercely he disagreed with you, he was pleasant.
Concerns that the immigration debate will blow the republican party to smithereens are a tad overblown. The media does not understand that these disagreements are why we are so strong intellectually. The same people who accuse the Bush administration of group think are the ones who also accuse it of secrecy. The President has every right to want dissension in the ranks kept behind closed doors from people who wish the administration only harm.
However, private citizens in a democracy are supposed to criticize things they disagree with (Are you listening Hillary?). These are major issues, and the republican party allows for adult discussions. Try deviating from San Francisco values and see how hard the democratic party smacks you down in the name of tolerance. Talk about group think.
This blog will continue to disappoint people in the republican party that have contempt for other members of our coalition. I say that we have our disagreements forcefully but respectfully. Then we can hammer the democrats on why they are wrong about virtually everything, once we are united. We can discuss turning Iran and Syria into 50,000 whole golf courses, and shoving the American flag up Guantanamo Bay prisoners hides until they go to the toilet red, white and blue. We can have tax cuts and grow the economy.
Yes, every family has disagreements, but we cannot let the outsiders overrun us by weakening ourselves. We are all we have.
I will not agree with the moderates, the libertarians or the social conservatives on every issue. However, if you refer to me as a democrat, or God forbid, a liberal, I reserve the right to show my pro-military stance by decking you as if you had insulted my parents (who are both good republicans).
There will never be another Ronald Reagan, but we can honor his memory by living up to his ideals and portraying his optimism. As Rush Limbaugh says, we should be optimistic and be of good cheer. Of course we should. We are winning, and have been since 1980. The liberals had their time from 1932-1980. It is our time now. The country is moving rightward, with the occasional victory by democrats being an aberration. They cannot govern because the American public at this stage in history does not agree with their ideas. We can govern, except when we get our guns together and fire in a circle. The 2nd amendment gives us the right to keep and bear arms, but nowhere does it say we should shoot each other. That is electoral suicide, and suicide is illegal.
We are Ronald Reagans children, and he ordered us to play nice. We are different and unique, and he loved us all. That is why we loved him. None of us were his favorite. We were like the different color jelly beans on his desk, equally sweet.
There are dangerous people out there wishing to hurt us, from liberals to terrorists. Yes, there are varying degrees, with liberals being nuisances and terrorists being evil, but if we cannot even defeat the most pathetic opponent we have, that being liberals in a country that does not have a true left at all, then how can we beat the terrorists.
2006 was a disgrace. We lost to people that believed nothing, because no beliefs were better than what we were perceived to have been offering.
So lets fight these divisive social issues in a civil manner, and be done with the squabbling by the time the primaries are over. The winner of the general election must have enough fight left to take on the Clintonistas. They cannot be damaged goods. We have the strongest group of candidates since 1980, and if we lose in 2008 we will only have ourselves to blame for beating ourselves.
For those republicans who take the ten commandments seriously, they had better remember to obey Ronald Reagans 11th commandment. It should be in big chiseled granite on every republican desk top. Thou shalt not speak ill of any other republican.
Thus saith Mr. Reagan, God rest his soul.
This article is a year old ... which explains why it makes little sense.
Your link also doesn’t work.
I hope that /s stands for *snickerable*. No wonder no one wants to respond to a silly person. You can’t even stay on subject.
You are a pathetic “one trick pony”.
Bye now. Go away.
Except when the "Republican" is a liberal Democrat with (R) after his name. Follow Mr. Reagan's advice, but don't do so in a naive, ignorant manner and don't believe that everyone who claims to be on your side is actually on your side.
|
The key to understanding this commandment, however, is who the “thou” is to whom he was speaking: politicians. There is no way that Ronald Reagan would have advocated cutting off the free speech rights of the people he adored.
Here... here!
* Applauds *
The difference is, that after careful consideration, I find McCain to be unacceptable on those same issues.
I see nothing in McCain's doormat and willing pawn of the Democrats' past that indicates he would do this.
“I was kinda hoping for J.C. Watts, but some have told me that he has some baggage.”
Yes, JC has some baggage. That’s a good thing, really. JC is THE example of how to be responsible for you own actions. Everyone makes mistakes, but it truly does take big person to stand up and say “I made a mistake, and this is how I will handle it”, which is exactly what he has done.
He is the a perfect example of “pulling yourself up by your bootstraps” and succeeding in life.
He, or Sarah Palin, would be my choice for Veep, and would cause me to vote, and vote for McManiac.
As far as “bridging” the racial divide, JC would do infinitely more than could Obama, who is actually causing more of a divide.
For all of the reasons stated above, I do not plan on casting a POTUS vote for the first time in my 35 years of voting experience, UNLESS a Conservative Veep is nominated.
Sweeet!
“That is neither Obama, nor McCain. Each are equally bad in regards to the Federal power limits, just in different areas.”
Which issues do you believe Obama is better on than McCain?
This doesn’t answer my question.
Well then, I would say that you are really screwed.
McCain is death on both. McCain-Feingold is just the tip of McCain's iceberg there.
As I said, both are horrible candidates. Barr, Baldwin, Paul, Thompson, Hunter, Tancredo, etc... are far better candidates that we'd be much better off supporting.
Beating the deceased horse RINO isn't getting us very far and is keeping us from backing a real winner instead of the "least of two very bad evils".
Stop using liberal logic to support your arguments and you might start making sense.
That's pretty much how I see it for the whole country: equally screwed no matter which one wins.
I suspect we do agree on many issues. Have a good day as well.
No, I’m not silly. The silly ones are the ones who would rather see Obama win than McCain.
In my opinion, McCain is the better choice over Hussein Obama. I wish we had Fred Thompson or Duncan Hunter but neither are here so......
He voted for the liberation of Iraq, for the funding of the troops fighting in Iraq, and for the surge, while Obama spends his time pandering to moveon.org.
Reagan is dead. McCain’s campaign of socialism reminds us of that fact on a daily basis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.