Skip to comments.
Obama's "The Audacity of Ghastly Grammar and Sucky Syntax"
"The Audacity of Hope" ^
| 07/13/08
| Polarik
Posted on 07/13/2008 10:14:14 AM PDT by Polarik
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
1
posted on
07/13/2008 10:14:16 AM PDT
by
Polarik
To: Polarik
''...Run-on sentences was something that my fourth-grade teacher taught our class how to avoid... What a very curious sentence to see from an author critiquing someone else's grammar. It appears to be a fourth-grade error of number.
Glass houses and stones, eh?
2
posted on
07/13/2008 10:20:39 AM PDT
by
SAJ
To: Polarik
Obama's reading of his book on tape will be a gift that keeps on giving through out the fall. The RNC is holding back until after Obama is officially nominated to really cut loose on him.
3
posted on
07/13/2008 10:22:16 AM PDT
by
counterpunch
(John McCain - For the LOVE of Country)
To: SAJ
eh... I can’t write worth a crap either.... I don’t like obama because he’s a socialist.
4
posted on
07/13/2008 10:24:41 AM PDT
by
Porterville
(I hasten karmic justice through revenge.)
To: Polarik
It is OK. Most Americans have been dumbed down to the point that they will accept any empty suit, no mater how he talks.
There is a good chance that this moron will be the next POTUS.
God bless the USA, but for now, I am happy not to be there.
America is likely to get CHANGE alright. I hope they like it.
5
posted on
07/13/2008 10:27:11 AM PDT
by
AlexW
(Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
To: Polarik
This book made Obama and Mrs Obama rich and ever more determined to change this mean soulless country.
How does THAT feel? Have a great day!
6
posted on
07/13/2008 10:29:58 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Porterville
Socialist, certainly. More specifically, a neo-Fascist a la Mussolini: he wants control of effectively every means of production, but can’t be bothered with the outright ownership, which would imply his executing some competent maintenance from time to time. Better to have his productive slaves do the maintenance work, right?
7
posted on
07/13/2008 10:30:06 AM PDT
by
SAJ
To: SAJ
And that's not an orphan:
One would think that, by the time he finished Harvard Law School and became a Law Lecturer, that Obama knows how to use appropriate grammar and syntax.
Followed by:
At the very least, Obama has to know even the most basics rules of writing like where to use punctuation (commas, semi-colons, and dashes), conjunctions (and, with), plural nouns, case, separating paragraphs by subject, and, most of all, avoiding run-on sentences.
'Basics' should be 'basic', and there should be a comma after "rules of writing". 'With' is NOT a conjunction.
Though he is probably correct about Obama's grammar problems, his entire critique, other than the hilariously funny title suggestion for Obama's book, is an embarrassment.
8
posted on
07/13/2008 10:31:50 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: Polarik
How racist of you to say that, despite of it being true. You must be a Republican [sic].
9
posted on
07/13/2008 10:40:41 AM PDT
by
FORTRUTHONLY
(Easy as 3.14159265358979323846...)
To: Polarik
Yes, when affirmative action meets Harvard you get degreed incompetents who feel good about themselves...
To: Polarik
What’s even more curious is that this book went completely through the editing/proofing/publishing process at a major publisher (Crown, a division of Random House) without being shaped up. Or maybe it WAS worked on, in which case the original manuscript would have been a real doozie, LOL.
MM
To: Polarik
The entire book is like this abysmal paragraph Aside from a couple howlers, little is actually wrong with the grammar. The history is the writer's own and is somewhat out of step with other interpretations.
12
posted on
07/13/2008 10:44:23 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(I will veto each and every beer)
To: savedbygrace
Yes, your first example is rather a howler, containing as it does both a tense
and a mood error. I haven't seen a that pair together in a long while.
However, that said, I'm not really here to shoot the messenger; I just wish the messenger would transmit the message a bit more coherently.
13
posted on
07/13/2008 10:46:56 AM PDT
by
SAJ
To: Polarik
The problem with his writing...is that what he is saying has been said so many times before....and it is irrelevant today....unless you’re looking for reparations.
14
posted on
07/13/2008 10:51:11 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
To: MississippiMan
Its curious...ninety percent of the writers who go via a publisher...would have a big cut and rewrite. After reading the example of paragraph from Obama....that wouldn’t have passed any of my university English instructors. They would have graded this a C-minus, with issues.
To: Polarik
Yet, to his leftist supporters, who basically lack any original thoughts of their own, OBama's sh*t souns like silk to their ears.How true.
16
posted on
07/13/2008 10:55:58 AM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(Wanted: A Presidential Candidate I can vote FOR...)
To: Polarik
I don't intend to EVER read his book, it is the way he speaks that makes me crazy. The hesitation and then the forcing out of the next few words. That guy on Sat. Nite Live can mimic him to a T!
17
posted on
07/13/2008 10:56:45 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: Polarik
Change you can count onSlogans you can dangle a preposition from
18
posted on
07/13/2008 10:57:35 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: SAJ
‘Run-on sentences’ is a subtopic of grammar.
19
posted on
07/13/2008 11:00:23 AM PDT
by
abclily
To: Polarik
How we speak and how we write is a reflection of our acquired knowledge and our thought processes, and for Obama, these processes are as jumbled as a jigsaw puzzle.Kids, don't do drugs.
20
posted on
07/13/2008 11:02:26 AM PDT
by
xjcsa
(Has anyone seen my cornballer?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson