Out of the Closet

Islam in Action ^ | July 11 2008 | Christopher Logan aka Exposing Islam

[Islaminaction]

I would like to inform the readers that I now will be using my real name Christopher Logan instead of Exposing Islam. When I first started researching and speaking about the problems that Islam brings to the world, I used Exposing Islam just as an Internet nickname. Most of you know, but not all, that I was an administrator and moderator at Jihad Chat since the board was opened.

For more....

[chaos_5]

I would like to inform the readers that I now will be using my real name Christopher Logan instead of Exposing Islam

I suppose this guy actually wants the death threats to show up at his house instead of his e-mail... yikes. Brave or stupid, I don't know.

[redstateconfidential]

My bumper sticker says American Infidel, sometimes I get an evil look from the “Jail religion “ Converts down here in Dar El Salam Georgia. They can suck it up.

[GOPJ]

Why are you doing this?

[sinanju]

Yankee infidel! I have a banana cream pie with your name on it!

On the day of judgement the stones shall cry out: “Servant of Allah! There is a blasphemer behind me, come and slime him!”

[xjcsa]

So is your screen name meant to be “Islam inaction” or “Islam in action”?

[Islaminaction]

Because I think I can reach a wider audience using a real name instead of an Internet nickname.

[Islaminaction]

Screen name was Exposing Islam.
The the name of the blog is Islam in Action.

[Islaminaction]

Lemon pie will do.

[Islaminaction]

I understand what you are saying. But others that speak out on the problem use thier name. Like Debbie Schussel or Mark Styen. Not sure if Robert Spencer is his real name.

Truthfully most of the nasty emails I get are from liberals.

[Finny]

On a related note ... I see stories lately of how Allah says dogs are "unclean," so the disabled kid with the guide dog in some American school is threatened out of existence; and bomb-sniffer dogs in England wear rubber booties to sniff the homes of Muslims. Some FReeper more or less observed the irony that in England, it will only be when Muslims come after their dogs that the sh*t will hit the fan and the people will fight back.

It would be a pretty foolish people who allowed man's longtime helpmate and companion, dogs, to be drummed out of their daily lives because of some clown that showed up 600 years after Christ. Plain evil, really.

Myself, I'd love to see every burka worn in American public jeered and ridiculed and ostracized out of this nation. It should be our protected right as Americans to be able to do just that. I scowl at those women. I think and would say aloud if challenged: get out of this country -- this is the wrong place for you. Those big screened things -- black, purple, white, I don't care what color -- are evil, plain evil. They look evil because they are evil, and the religion that caused them must be cast OUT. Go wear them on your own soil, Muslims. See where it gets you, since you haven't figured it out after 1400 years. It gets you nowhere but ugly, envious, petty, bitter, violent squalor.

[Islaminaction]

I agree Burqas are a sign of opression and should be against the law. Wait until they go after the Brits alcohol.....

[Ouderkirk]

Moderate Muslims may not carry weapons and murder innocent people hands on, but they play the role of “wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Moderate Muslims use two primary strategies to make conquest for Islam. The first is dawa, which is influence peddling, “wining and dining” and manipulation. You make conquest by “pleasing” your opponent, “buttering them up” — bribery and back room dealings are common place. There is a “ton” of Muslim oil money buying preferential treatment for Islam in America. The second is taqiyya, which is outright deception and lying. Deception and lying to infidels as a strategy of conquest is one of Islam’s most valued “weapons”, a precedent set by the prophet Mohammed himself. Americans hear this deception everyday with proclamations that “Islam is a religion of peace.” This phrase is an excellent example of successful psychological warfare which has caused Americans to let down their guard, and made us very vulnerable to future terrorist attacks, even possible nuclear attacks as several experts have pointed out.

Recent history proves that the “so called peaceful Muslims” work as a team with their Islamic Military. They immigrate to a country touting what peaceful law abiding citizens they are, establish themselves, build mosques, increase their numbers and “bingo” terrorists acts start occurring in the host country. Do the attacks in Spain, England, France, Thailand, Bali, the Philippines, Holland, Sweden and the USA ring any bells here? All these attacks have been preceded by the establishment of moderate mosque communities which in turn became footholds from which the Islamic military could launch their terrorist attacks. The larger the percentage of Muslims that occupy a country the greater the havoc they wreak. The situation is directly proportional. Reducing the percentage of Muslims that dwell in the host country is the most effect way of stopping terrorism. Western governments must evaluate this fact very seriously if they wish to win the war against Islamofascism long term.