Posted on 07/07/2008 8:09:33 AM PDT by freespirited
Welfare Reform see Documented LIE #63
The first bill that's cited is the 1997 law that created the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program in Illinois. The ad claims Obama "passed a law to move people from welfare to work, slashed the rolls by 80 percent." That's going too far. First, the law in question wasn't dreamed up out of thin air by its sponsors. It was the follow-up to the welfare reform act, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act, that President Clinton signed on Aug. 26, 1996. That law gave states the ability to design their own welfare programs as long as they met certain federal requirements, including limits on how long recipients could get benefits. The bill that Obama cosponsored was Illinois' version.
And far from having "passed" the bill single-handedly, Obama was among five Senate sponsors of the measure, as we said previously. It was passed by both chambers of the Illinois Legislature and signed into law by the governor.
Welfare reform was successful in moving people off public assistance. There was about a 78 percent drop in the number of families receiving public assistance in Illinois between 1998 and 2006. But we don't think Obama alone, or even Obama and the four other sponsors of the Illinois law, can take credit for all of this. It was the federal law, hammered out by Clinton and the Republican Congress, that set the wheels in motion and forced states to act. Nationwide, the number of families on welfare declined quite a bit as well, going from 3,146,870 in '98 to 1,805,900 in '06, a decrease of almost 43 percent.
Also, our friends at PolitiFact talked to an expert who said part of the steep drop in Illinois' numbers was due to other factors, such as a state bureaucracy that took an aggressive approach to ejecting people from the rolls, sometimes erroneously.
.
by Viveca Novak
I'm not part of that scene, so I can only venture a completely unqualified guess. Is it possible that law students don't start writing papers for the law review until they are put on it? IOW, that you get appointed based on grades and professor recommendations (and in Obama's case, it is rumored, nonstop brown-nosing?)
Now to never write anything for your own publication while you *are* editor, I believe that is pretty darn unheard of.
Affirmative Action
Affirmative action admission to Harvard.
Affirmative action hire to be editor to the law Review.
Affirmative action book contract.
Affirmative action hire to U.S. Senate.
Affirmative action selection by the Democrat Party as 2008 nominee.
Affirmative action hire as President of the United States of America.
Oh yeah, this story’s going to have a happy ending.
I guess I worked my way through High school too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.