Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dalight

I believe post #564 is addressed to you.

You have not demonstrated that BHO used an original embossed and stamped birth certificate to get his passport. There are a number of substitute documents that can be used for the purposes of getting a passport, as detailed in post #564.

Therefore the validity or even the existence of a document he may not have even used to get a passport is moot.

The validity of what he is purporting to be his BC on his web site is still very much in play.

As it is neither embossed, nor stamped, and shows some electronic fingerprints of tampering, it is hardly proof positive of his birth as a citizen.


828 posted on 07/04/2008 10:14:25 AM PDT by null and void (every Muslim, the minute he can differentiate, carries hate of Americans, Jews & Christians - OBL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 814 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
As it is neither embossed, nor stamped, and shows some electronic fingerprints of tampering, it is hardly proof positive of his birth as a citizen.

Sometimes its easy not to read very well here. Your post doesn't make much sense to me.. but I will reinterate what I said before, any of the the substitute documents are intended to establish the fact that a valid birth certificate could have been issued and/or that the individual is indeed a citizen of the United States.

This is a very different test then the Constitutional test for eligibility to be the President.

But, you keep missing my point. That if an alternate document was used to obtain this passport, then he must have proved first that no birth certificate exists which would be equally damning.

889 posted on 07/04/2008 12:14:55 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson