[bvw]

I’m hoping some graphic artist will take the side-angled shots of the new FactCheck CoLB images, map them flat using a graphic trapezoid remap tool and lay that down on the older FactCheck image, and also on the older Kos image. What you have is three trapezoid to cut out, rectangularize and lay as a transparency or merge over the older flat-scanned image.

[Polarik]

I did that already. The most significant things I found are that A)The top fold on the FactCheck photo runs diagonal (left side of fold is 20 pixels further down than the right side of fold) while top fold on the FactCheck image runs perfectly horizontal with the top border."

B)The signature stamp and date stamp look equally clear, yet it is impossible to bring out anything more than a spotty and amorphous blob, which people like Koyaan, RayAus, etc. "hail" as proof of its "authenticity."

If I ever posted that, I'd be laughed off the planet

There is no reason, whatsoever, for the signature stanp to be that way, EXCEPT if it were a forgery.

C)The embossed seal in the photos shows up 3,000% percent clearer than that almost totally faded embossed seal on the FactCheck image. Not only is it faded, but only 1/2 to 2/3 of it show at all. Compare that to every other COLB run through image enhancement, and it's only the FactCheck/Kos image that looks this way.