THIS was verified by the Obama Campaign. When the campaign was questioned about a birth certificate in Mombasa, THEY said, no Mombasa registered the birth.
I speculate that the problem they have with letting people look at the Mombasa birth registration is that it says he was born in Kenya and if the Mombasa documents come out, they intend to say that is simply an error--he wasn't born there.
The fundamental Constitutional problem with definition of the term "natural born" is this. With respect to a person who becomes a U S Citizen at birth (and Obama did not if he was born in Kenya) even though born outside the US is that they are subject to sovereignty where they are born which may well define them as citizens of some other country, subject to sovereignty of such country. That is why most Constitutional lawyers think the term "natural born" means born within the geographical confines of the US.
I don't think Senior's intention has much to do with it. If Obama was born in Honolulu, he is going to be held eligible; if he was born in Kenya, he is not. Simple as that.
>>>I don’t think Senior’s intention has much to do with it. If Obama was born in Honolulu, he is going to be held eligible; if he was born in Kenya, he is not. Simple as that.
What about having to reaffirm his citizenship at the age of 18? Wouldn’t he needed to do that if his father, at that time, had British Citizenship?