Your twisting my words. Trust but verify and follow the facts I’ve said all along. I don’t know nor care who the ‘experts’ are, I care what real facts and logic are brought to bear. Despite your claims, AJ Strata has not misled anyone.
You are trusting people who made incorrect statements earlier on and making assertions that violate Shannon Information theory to justify an unjustifiable distrust of someone whose points have not been substantively refuted.
It’s not ‘ad groupinem’ (whatever the h*ll that is) to point out that:
1. The original “its a forgery” claim was that OpenDNA was the *source* of the KOS and Obama site images.
2. Certain people advanced that theory to “prove” Obama had a forged BC.
3. That theory was debunked.
4. Now the same people advancing theory #2 are moving on to another theory.
This is tiresome nonsense, which is probably why AJ Strata has gotten brusque and rude in your estimation. His rudeness doesnt make him wrong and it doesnt make you right. Meanwhile, I suggest you *do* plough through AJ strata’s arguments before pronouncing him wrong. if you cant even understand his point, why are you claiming to know he’s not right?
You have made assertions that “Obama’s BC is a forgery because” ... and given reasons that are weak, wrong and circular logic. it’s like whack-a-mole, though, the same bad logic is recycled and repeated ad nauseum.
The myth remains busted.
There is a "talking past each other" dynamic in that AJ dust-up. Your three first points are a fair enough summary of AJ's position, as I also understand he has it -- if only that were as far as he took it.
However for the interests of time, a shortcut I take here in response.
DaleInAtlanta, the poster on AJ's site -- the liberal Obama supporting Dale, has busted AJ's argument on that line.
All other significant busting up of AJ's conflation, to my view, has best been done by techdude.
The BC that has been presented by Obama's own website is almost certainly a forgery, and it is a fraudulent presentation.