” It seems to me that it is almost beyond any doubt that the Obama birth certificate is a forgery.”
- The form matches real BC forms. See KJC1’s comments on this thread.
- Several people have analyzed it and judge the image is not doctored.
- The BC confirms consistently with the place of birth and date of birth that Barack obama has given all along
“(1) That the cert # is blacked out.”
#1 proves nothing as there were ‘innocent’ reasons for Obama campaign to do that,
“(2) That the cert reads “Filed on” instead of “accepted on.” “
Wrong debunked via KJC1 comments.
“(3) The very stonewalling itself is an evidence “
#3 is supposition/perception. Obama has been forthcoming and posted the BC. They are not stonewalling from most people’s perspective, as most are satisfied on the point.
If that’s all you got as evidence of forgery you really have no evidence of forgery at all.
“The way the 1st amendment woks, as I understand, is that once a witness starts talking about a subject he just can’t tell a part of the story, he has to tell the whole story, the whole truth.” - The way the 1st A works is you get to express your views. Period.
And what possibly could those "innocent" reasons be? We know by observation, IF that was a true BC his numbers would have been, 151 1961. The last numbers would more than likely be the sequence number of the certificate. There was NO reason to block it out unless they didn't want to get caught using a number that would not have been his.
I'm sure you realize, then, that they innocently invalidated the document by doing that. If they want to convince me, then they must use a legal document to do so. Even if the document is not a forgery, it is invalidated as a legal document.
-PJ