“The FACT that the form is different than other known good copies of the same data and revision number?”
Debunked. A similar form was posted by a freeper on this thread.
“The FACT that the border on the alleged BC IS ON A DIFFERENT LAYER in the posted document’s image file? “
Fact or claim? AJ Strata didnt acknowledge that.
“The FACT that a host of artifacts in the posted “blank document” exactly match the alleged BHO BC?”
Because we now know that the blank doc was derived from it, as OpenDNA assserted in the first place as AJ Strata analysis confirmed. That debunks one claim the ‘its a forgery crowd’ was making.
“The FACT that document has different text in the form than known good documents?” Not all forms are exactly the same is all. As noted above, a freeper posted a BC that had the exact same form as Obama’s, showing that it was valid in its form relative to other legit BCs.
“The FACT that the time and location of birth just happen to be EXACTLY the same as on the posted ‘fill in the blanks and make your own’ “blank document”.”
Duh, because the ‘fill in the blanks’ form was derived from it. That’s been the BIG LIE of the “Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery” from the get go - the blogger admitted no such thing! He admitted taking the Kos image and playing with it, and some people just got the order derivation wrong.
“What koolaid drinker are you trusting for the Gospel Truth here?”
This was a KOS setup from the get-go and the conspiracy-minded fell for it hook-line-sinker. It was and is a distraction from the real issues with Obama.
Obama was born in Hawaii, and I stand by this statement: The BC on Obama’s website might well be legitimate, in fact the preponderance of evidence points in that direction.