Good point about the decorations - but it might have been late Dec. or early Jan. - then she probably would have been only 2 months pregnant? Of course I’m not sure we ‘know’ the photo has anything to do with a wedding or couple-related travel at all. That’s just what it said in one article?? But unless the photo was precisely dated at the time (which I don’t think many people ever did in the pre-digital days), whoever said she was “3 months” pregnant at time of that photo may have been guess or “mis-remembering”.....
I mentioned in another post, if you have both photos, the one with his ‘wife’ and the other with his ‘son’, both pictures have the same decorations in the background, the picture was taken in the exact same spot, he had on the same suit and tie...separate photos taken over a span of five+ years.
See my posting at #1096. I am responsible for getting this started. I made an assumption. Sorry!