Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom
Sorry. Occasionally I get a little hazy on who said what.
Can’t imagine why...
hehehe
Reasion can be his mother's age, parents' marital state, rope-a-dope, etc.
Thank you, null and void.
I am reading on.
You know me. I tend to mouth off, especially when it comes to McNut, so I am trying keep quiet and behave myself.
Your knowledge between the difference of the Canal Zone and Panama is incredible.
You are doing great. I nominate you for adoption as a Canal Zonian.
By the way, and I meant to tell you at the time, your enlarged map Colón was terrific. Thank you.
I had a good teacher.
Everything I know on that topic, I learned from you...
LOL!!!
Not at all.
You did it on your own.
Thank you.
We don't know...but what I found interesting was that this woman's father arrived in the US from Kenya in the same aircraft as obama snr.
You said: “It indicates he wasn’t in Kenya, but it doesn’t demonstrate he was in Hawaii, either”
1. Strictly speaking, you’re right.
2. As a practical matter, leaving Obama’s account aside, there has been confusion in reporting this period of time: In alluding to the letter sent by Senior to Sarah: “There wasn’t much on how they met or what the attraction was, but he announced their plans to wed.
The ***Dunhams*** weren’t happy. Stanley Ann’s prospective father-in-law was furious. He wrote the Dunhams “this long, nasty letter saying that he didn’t approve of the marriage,” Obama recounted his mother telling him in “Dreams.” http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-0703270151mar27,0,1310554.story?page=3
A non-attentive reader might reasonably infer from the above construction that the Dunham’s were Stanley Ann’s prospective in-laws. Otherwise, the “flow” doesn’t make sense. If the reporter really meant the Dunham’s, then the next sentence should have said Stanley Ann’s prospective father-in-law ALSO was furious. It makes me wonder whether the reporter inserted “Dunham’s” when “Obama’s” was what was intended.
3. From the allafrica.com account, one additional piece of data that raises questions about the objectivity/accuracy of Sarah’s account is: “The marriage later broke up after Anna’s father opposed it, according to Mama Sarah.” We all know the real reason was because Sarah’s foster son abandoned Ann and her newborn son!
4. FWIW, I now realize what led me to “misremember” Senior as being in graduate school:
a) “Stanley Ann began classes at the University of Hawaii in 1960, and shortly after that, Box received a letter saying that her friend had fallen in love with a ***grad*** student. He was black, from Kenya and named Obama.”
b) “her new relationship with Barack Obama and weekend discussions seemed to be, in part, a logical extension of long coffeehouse sessions in Seattle and the teachings of Wichterman and Foubert. The forum now involved ***graduate*** students from the University of Hawaii.” http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-0703270151mar27,0,1310554.story?page=4
Obama snr - Harvard document.
>>>but their process for generating COLBs clearly is drawing from a digitized database, as opposed to having a clerk pull an original, signed certificate from a file
HI doesn’t issue digital birth certificates. That was verified by Polarik, Techdude, Dr. Mitchell Langbert, and Israel Inside.
Sorry, I didn’t mean to imply that they had digitized images that were printed out for COLBs: I meant that the DATA used to print the COLBs were in some centralized database so that clerks didn’t have to rely on manually (or even electronically) pulling a hard-copy or fiche of the original birth record in order to respond to requests for COLBs.
I assume someone just types in a name, DOB or certificate number to search a database, selects the correct record and then hits PRINT etc. But this more efficient arrangement presupposes that at least some selected pieces of data originally appearing on birth certificates were transferred/transcribed into such a database.
“Here is the best explanation I have read on the accepted vs. filed question:”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2059075/replies?c=123
I’m posting this link from another thread because this comment originally from TD website, posted by on FR by raycpa answers a question I have asked a number of times.
Don’t miss it.
He published a book, Obama, the Man Behind the Mask, it was due out this past July. I am on pre order for it. A few days before the first shipment was due at the warehouse, it was held up at the publishers. Andy Martin didn't say why it was held up. But I've not received it yet. Andy Martin has been on his scheduled Book Tour doing press conferences anyway.
If I remember correctly, a blog by Dr. Mitchell Langbert stated how the process was handled when he interviewed some people from Dept. Of Health in his blog.
I didn’t have the impression that the archives were databased accessed yet.
He is only going to have to prove it if legal challenges are made in a substantial number of states and if those challenges win BEFORE the election.
Did you see USMCobra’s link under RayCPA’s?
>>>>If, in fact, his father Registered his Birth in Mombasa it would provide bona fide evidence that Barack Hussein Obama, Snr, intended his son to have British, or Kenyan, and not US Citizenship. <<<<
THIS was verified by the Obama Campaign. When the campaign was questioned about a birth certificate in Mombasa, THEY said, no Mombasa registered the birth.
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.