Posted on 06/20/2008 8:17:06 AM PDT by pissant
A proven liar needs to produce inconvertable and independent evidence in order to be taken seriously. I don’t think that Mr. Sinclair has done this.
I would love for someone to come forward with evidence showing the world the real Obama, but this one isn’t it.
He has given the media the name of the driver, so maybe someone will track him down. He also gave CPD an affadavit and phone records. The story is has just begun.
And then there's this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4cjtRgnj7pA
The mitch/nan crowd is getting hysterical, posting at least 3 times as many attack articles and comments than larry’s group posts update info. They’re getting so much flack, there must be some target they are approaching.
Larry’s side claims the Rat powers looking into this are encouraging him to pursue the drug issue - there’s more there there than the gay adultery issue.
The MSM established quite a track-record for ignoring all of Bubbas indiscretions too. They now have years of experience at obfuscation, deceit, minimizing, and out-right lying. They will protect the Messiah with all their might and smear anyone who challenges him.
The Horror!!
Can't we ever learn that the DEmmies thrive on slime. You can bury them in Yak manure and they bloom like orchids. Nobody touches this. Remember Bubba's Bimbos
Excellent points. I have no reason to give Obama the benefit of the doubt on anything that comes out of his mouth...
Yeah, it is.
This Larry Sinclair business is arguably the most retarded stuff ever posted to FR.
Why should I be "rooting"" for him? How would you feel if some nut was claiming he banged you?
This is a very convincing and well written blog article.
The comparison between Sinclair and Obama is well organized, is clear, concise and factual. I haven’t see any poster attempt to refute the content of the blog.
The fact is, Sinclair has nothing to lose (except maybe his life?) by coming forward with this stuff. If anything, he has virtually assured himself of having a most miserable life for as long as that life continues.
Obama, on the other hand has EVERYTHING to lose, from A to Z. If Obama is truly innocent of the allegations Sinclair is making, he should have a polygraph performed on himself to establish his own veracity, and to refute Sinclair once and for all.
I’d deny it and sue for libel.
This is what I have been saying since the beginning! ;)
There’s no doubt in my mind that Larry would immediatedly produce a legitimate copy of his birth certificate, if requested.
So why doesn't he do just that? Without the worship and dedication of the MSM, Obama would be pressured into providing evidence of everything he's hiding about himself. That would destroy Obama in an afternoon.
I find Larry Sinclair highly credible.
What straight man, when asked about his favorite food, answers "arugula?"
“I find them about equally credible, actually in-credible.”
Did you happen to watch the Larry Sinclair press conference? If not, you might want to check it out. I did and I do think Sinclair is telling the truth.
http://larrysinclair.org/press.html
(Video takes a minute to load and is about 45 minutes long.)
I’VE ACTUALLY SEEN OBAMA LIE DURING THE DEBATES WHEN HE SAID HE ONLY KNEW REZKO BECAUSE OF DOING 5 HRS LEGAL WORK FOR HIM. LIE, LIE, LIE! THINK I BELIEVE LARRY SINCLAIR OVER OBAMA ANYDAY! WHY ISN’T THE MEDIA DOING THEIR JOB AND INVESTIGATING THIS. WHY ARE THE AMERICAN VOTERS LEFT IN THE DARK WHEN THEY HAVE TO MAKE THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION ELECTING THE PRESIDENT? IS THE FIX IN? LET’S FIND OUT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.