Well without something besides his story the only thing we have to go on is the lie detector test. Until he brings up some form of evidence he’s got nothing....
Or are we just going to start believing any story by every Tom, Dick....and Larry...
This is why he's releasing a name and phone #'s. He is trying to get access to evidence. He has tried to get access to Obama's cell phone records, which he says will prove his allegations. If he is lying, why would he keep trying to get them? Hopefully, they will surface without alteration.
What would you do to prove yourself if certain evidence was not pursued, and some of it denied access?? Would you have the courage to proceed and expose your own shameful past in order to prevent what you consider a potential tragedy? Would you risk rejection and ridicule to attempt to expose what you believed was the possible connection to a violent crime? Would you step around a metropolitan political machine's "investigation?"
Or would you cave after an imperfect lie detector test didn't support your claim?
One final note: Did you notice this line from Mr. Sinclair:
"Whitehouse.com’s own examiner, Dr. Gordon Barland, observed that on the drug question regarding Senator Obama that the computerized score found that there was less than a 1% probability of deception by me. That’s about as high a passing score as one can possibly attain."