Posted on 06/15/2008 6:40:37 AM PDT by pissant
This would probably IMPROVE Obama’s image with liberals.
Either way, true or false, the MSM will declare Obama a saint.
The gay part maybe. Not so sure about the coke though
The media never shyed away from rumors about Mark Foley or that toe tapper being homosexuals.
Long before those scandals that drove them from office broke, the Left had been running such accusations in print and online for YEARS.
So why is The Golden Child supposed to be immune from such dirt?
Obama has already admitted to the cocaine use.
What has not been addressed was if he ever dealt coke or smoked crack.
The polygraph testers asserted that Larry Sinclair was deceptive on two questions.
" Surely if Obama was bent in that direction and could have his pick of lovers and rent boys, he could do one hell of a lot better than Larry Sinclair. "
I think the most important issue is Young, because if he claimed a relationship with Obama and was murdered...who and why? Sinclair has received death threats, and from whom? Why? If there is no truth to either of them claiming to have had sex with Obama, then why not just ignore them...it does make you wonder?
They’ve already have done that. It is our job to expose him as a lying, corrupt marxist
This is not even a rumor either. It is a direct accusation by a guy who allegedly participated, who has signed multiple legal documents -including an affidavit to the Chicago PD - that his story is true, and who is willing to do whatever it takes to get the story out.
If this was a Bush accuser, he’d have been front page across every MSM outlet in the world by now, and David Gregory would be frothing at the mouth about it in every Dana Perino press conference.
Two questions during a multi hour interview. Perhaps the outfit that did this test will release the entire interview, since they recorded it on video, with the agreement it would be released in its entirety. Still waiting...
NOT there's anything wrong with that.
1. Obama's real name is "Barry Mohammad Dunham".
2. Obama had sex with Larry Sinclair.
3. Obama's wife rants against "whitey" on a tape.
4. Obama is not eligable to be U.S. president.
These are some awfully bad smears this early in the race.
# 1. Sinclair has as much right to hold his press conference and say what he likes as anyone else, whether one agrees with him or thinks what he has to say is false or not. Its the left that keep screaming about first amendment rights..that is until someone has something bad to say about anyone from the left...then they want to turn America into Stalinist Russia, and shut people up. Not gonna happen. This is America.
# 2. Michael Moore is an even sleazier, more disgusting individual than Sinclair ever was, and his Fahrenheit 9/11 has more lies than any so-called “documentary” ever shown is movie houses in this country. That still didn't prevent most liberals from believing his lies 100%, nor did it prevent the lame brain media from giving his fraudulent movie 24/7 coverage all the way to the November elections. So don't let me hear any liberals whine about so-called “smears”. Liberals live on smearing Republican candidates with every outrageous lie known to man. Even as we speak Rosie O'Donnell's is till peddling her “Bush bombed the WTC” lies, and she did that everyday on her mainstream media TV program for years, with no worries whatsoever.
# 3. It's irrelevant if the MSM give Sinclair's allegations any publicity or not. The MSM totally ignored the VERY TRUE allegations of the Swift Boat heroes as well....until they used alternative means to get their messages to the American people, by writing a book which sold over a 1 million in very short time. Today, thanks to Youtube, conservative blogs, conservative talk radio, Sinclair has already been able to get his massage to millions. If he is determined enough, he will get his message to even more millions before he elections, MSM coverage or not. The MSM's power and influence continues to go down every election cycle.
#4. Obama’s so-called anti-smear site has yet to deny that Obama met or knows Sinclair.
Let Sinclair have his say. If he is lying, the story will go nowhere. If he did indeed met Obama, the truth will come out.
KJ how’s that mayoral race going in Sacto?
The distinguishing thing about Burkett wasn't his persistence or persuasiveness, rather that he chanced to get through to the willing ears of Mapes and through her Rather.
Any story that can only be corroborated by the dead must, ipso facto, draw deep skepticism.
And while a careless libel of a Republican president might be overlooked (Rather and Mapes choked on the cover up) being implicated in something like memogate aimed at a black Democratic contender is a guaranteed career ender.
It’s going like a Jeremiah Wright sermon.
What on earth are you going on about?
....and Bill Clinton's "gems" where a lot better?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.