Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/22/2008 4:52:33 AM PDT by Quaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Quaker

Well, at least she had the decency to recuse herself on two votes relating to the California housing crisis.

Too bad (for her) that her gamble didn’t pay off. Maybe she should try the racetracks next time.

Regards,


3 posted on 05/22/2008 4:58:11 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker
"The report says she recused herself on two key house votes on government efforts to address the foreclosure crisis."

At least she had the good sense to recuse herself.
4 posted on 05/22/2008 4:59:03 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker

It’s someone else’s fault, no doubt.


5 posted on 05/22/2008 5:00:44 AM PDT by LIConFem (Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker

Aren’t home mortgages non recourse in California, i.e., owners can walk w/o being liable for any deficiency?


6 posted on 05/22/2008 5:04:21 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker
It’s not her primary residence. According to Capitol Weekly, “[s]he also owns a four-bedroom house in Long Beach, in her Congressional district. Real estate records show she purchased that house in 1999 for $135,000. An estimate from Zillow.com puts the current value of that house at $474,000.”

 

7 posted on 05/22/2008 5:12:29 AM PDT by browardchad ("We are all mavericks now." -- Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker

Why is this even newsworthy? We can see their fiscal philosophy with every budget proposal.


10 posted on 05/22/2008 5:39:39 AM PDT by CSM (Kakistocracy: Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker

11 posted on 05/22/2008 5:48:45 AM PDT by OBXWanderer (www.dontvoterino.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker

I believe that she could have paid her mortgage on her Congressional salary. What a rotten example.


13 posted on 05/22/2008 5:58:38 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker

Congressional Ethics committee might be interested.

Opps, didn’t see the (D). Never mind.


15 posted on 05/22/2008 6:04:49 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker
ting the house slip into foreclosure and left it in shambles less than two years after she purchased it with no down payment.

Kind of like what the Democrats are doing to California and want to do to the US.

17 posted on 05/22/2008 6:15:11 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quaker

Nothing new in the urban sense of things.....the Metropolitan Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) in Atlanta once had a chairman of its board who, very recently before ‘earning’ her position was on welfare and lived in public housing.


31 posted on 05/22/2008 2:45:29 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson