Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Congresswoman Defaults On $578,000 Mortgage
Stuck On Stupid ^ | May 22, 2008 | Quaker

Posted on 05/22/2008 4:52:33 AM PDT by Quaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: El Laton Caliente

Anyone who does a no-money down, interest-only mortgage on a non-primary residence and shortly thereafter takes out an equity loan for cash — then defaults — should immediately be thrown in jail for fraud. Along with their co-conspirator, the loan officer.


21 posted on 05/22/2008 7:11:55 AM PDT by vincentfreeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DManA
It doesn’t penalize the lenders. It peanalizes people with good credit who might not now get a loan or who will pay much more for one.

Then why are lenders going bankrupt is such large numbers? Those with good credit have absolutely no problem getting a loan on an accurately appraised house. I'm in the mortgage business, so I know. If your credit isn't so great, that's another story.

22 posted on 05/22/2008 7:54:28 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

I wouldn’t doubt it.

The basis of “liberalism” is not being responsible for your behaviors and choices.


23 posted on 05/22/2008 7:57:26 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vincentfreeman
Anyone who does a no-money down, interest-only mortgage on a non-primary residence and shortly thereafter takes out an equity loan for cash — then defaults — should immediately be thrown in jail for fraud. Along with their co-conspirator, the loan officer.

In most cases, the loan oficer merely takes the application and documents. The lender decides how they want the info documented. If the LO gives the lender info based on fraudulent or perjured documents, that's a different story.

24 posted on 05/22/2008 8:00:57 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All

doesn’t this qualify her to be the House Ways and Means chairclown? Or maybe the appropriations committee. Fed Reserve chairclown.


25 posted on 05/22/2008 9:54:12 AM PDT by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
It penalizes lenders who make loans on over-valued houses.

It also penalizes lenders who make good loans, but get stuck when housing prices drop below the mortgage amounts and the borrower walks. True?

26 posted on 05/22/2008 10:10:24 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye
It also penalizes lenders who make good loans, but get stuck when housing prices drop below the mortgage amounts and the borrower walks. True?

The lenders knew the law prior to making the loans, so in effect, it was part of the terms of their contract with the borrower; wasn't it?

The lenders knew or should have known that prices were so out of whack that the selling prices made no sesnse. In large part, it was their relaxed lending standards that led to the escalating housing prices. We are now seeing a long overdue correction. The lenders were the ones pressuring appraisers to raise the value of the homes, not the borrower. Why would a borrower do that?

27 posted on 05/22/2008 10:25:14 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

And lets irresponsible borrowers off the hook.


28 posted on 05/22/2008 10:53:41 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
I don't dispute some of what you write, but there has been a history of housing prices in California taking big swings. Owners have walked before, maybe not to the extent they are this time around.

I believe people should stand by their commitments and not shift their losses to the lenders. There is something wrong when people walk just because they are upside down re: loan to value.

29 posted on 05/22/2008 11:47:00 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

Both borrowers and lenders take a risk. When there is a foreclosure or a borrower walks away, they both lose. This is how it should be.


30 posted on 05/22/2008 2:43:52 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Quaker

Nothing new in the urban sense of things.....the Metropolitan Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) in Atlanta once had a chairman of its board who, very recently before ‘earning’ her position was on welfare and lived in public housing.


31 posted on 05/22/2008 2:45:29 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vincentfreeman

I knew of a lawyer once that knew all the tricks about delinquent mortgages. He never paid the payments, and every six months or so he’d file the necessary remediation plans, etc. whatever they were, make one payment and then start the whole process over. 2 payments a year? Not bad!


32 posted on 05/22/2008 2:47:32 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson