[vincentfreeman]

"I would think the fact that she is wearing a skirt means that she expects some privacy"

She had "some" privacy. If she wanted more, she could have worn a full length skirt. Or slacks.

[messierhunter]

"She had "some" privacy. If she wanted more, she could have worn a full length skirt. Or slacks."

I can't believe some of these responses. If she had "some" privacy, in this case, proper clothing that required a pervert with a mirror to circumvent, then of course she had a reasonable expectation of privacy! A reasonable person should conclude that she had a reasonable expectation that no one was going to be staring at her panties while she's walking around. Why is that so hard to understand? The mere fact that a perv was able to spy on her does not mean she didn't have a reasonable expectation of privacy. If someone installs a camera inside your house to watch you undress, it doesn't mean you didn't have a reasonable expectation of privacy just because that expectation was not actually met.

[AFPhys]

I wonder if this judge thinks she should have been wearing a burka.