[Coyoteman]

This blog is nonsense.

Practically every day, for the past 150 years, evidence reputed to ‘prove’ Darwinism has been shown to be invalid or fake...

I would challenge the author to name five fakes in the past 150 years. I'll even spot you two as a starter: Piltdown and Archaeoraptor.

It should be easy to come up with three more fakes if they are occurring "practically every day" -- that would leave a population of some 25,000-30,000 such examples to choose from.

[PurpleMountains]

How about Hagel’s embryos and the gray moths in England, quickly to add a couple?

[grayhog]

I’m not sure how everything got here, but I’m pretty confident it wasn’t Darwinism — as in millions of mutations over millions of years leading to human life.

My understanding is that Darwin could only prove evolution within species - the beaks of the finches getting longer or shorter during feast or famine etc... He used that to make the big leap to evolution between species.

Statistically, there should be tens of thousands of accidental mutation species that are the in-between species that didn’t quite work out for every species that now exists. The problem is, there is no fossil evidence of these in-between species. Just lots of fossils of those species that exist or did exist. Seems a little odd that we find hundreds of thousands of fossils of fully developed species, but not any that I’ve heard of the in betweens. In my mind, that leaves Darwinism just as a theory - an idea still awaiting proof.

[LiteKeeper]

Peppered moths in England
Haeckel's Embryos
Darwin's Finches

[LetTruthBeTold]

3rd Java man: Initially discovered by Dutchman Eugene Dubois in 1891, all that was found of this claimed originator of humans was a skullcap, three teeth and a femur. The femur was found 50 feet away from the original skullcap a full year later. For almost 30 years Dubois downplayed the Wadjak skulls (two undoubtedly human skulls found very close to his "missing link"). (source: Hank Hanegraaff, The Face That Demonstrates The Farce Of Evolution, [Word Publishing, Nashville, 1998], pp.50-52)

4th The theory of embryonic recapitulation asserts that the human fetus goes through various stages of its evolutionary history as it develops. Ernst Haeckel proposed this theory in the late 1860’s, promoting Darwin’s theory of evolution in Germany. He made detailed drawings of the embryonic development of eight different embryos in three stages of development, to bolster his claim. His work was hailed as a great development in the understanding of human evolution. A few years later his drawings were shown to have been fabricated, and the data manufactured. He blamed the artist for the discrepancies, without admitting that he was the artist. (source: Russell Grigg, "Fraud Rediscovered", Creation, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.49-51)

5th The most recent and perhaps the most infamous evolution frauds was committed in China and published in 1999 in the journal National Geographic 196:98-107, November 1999. Dinosaur bones were put together with the bones of a newer species of bird and they tried to pass it off as a very important new evolutionary intermediate. "Feathers For T-Rex?", Christopher P. Sloan, National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 196, No. 5, November, 1999, pp.99,100,105 Interesting Quote - "National Geographic has reached an all-time low for engaging in sensationalistic, unsubstantiated, tabloid journalism" Storrs L. Olson, Smithsonian Institution http://www.nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html