Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/18/2008 6:58:26 AM PDT by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: shove_it; abb

pinging abb


2 posted on 05/18/2008 6:59:13 AM PDT by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

3 posted on 05/18/2008 7:05:01 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

To logical & rational people, this argument is sound. But to a liberal - this is the way their minds think:

The same way that you don’t condemn Al Gore for his huge carbon footprint (private jetting all over the world) - you don’t condemn newspaper’s huge carbon footprint either. You see, to an irrational way of thinking - Al Gore and the newspapers are the MESSENGERS, and you don’t “shoot the messenger”.

I know, it doesn’t make any sense at all, but there it is.


4 posted on 05/18/2008 7:06:04 AM PDT by alicewonders (I'm a conservative, and I'm hated by the GOP & the Dems - I must be doing something right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

The Dead Tree media shut down their presses....For Mother Earth.

Pray for W and Freedom Fighters


6 posted on 05/18/2008 7:32:59 AM PDT by bray (If everyone hates you, you must be doin something right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shove_it

You had me until:

“CO2 matters, because a dangerous buildup of the gas in the atmosphere – caused by the growing consumption of fossil fuels and the decimation of our forests – is causing the earth to warm to such dangerous and unprecedented levels that the health of the planet and its inhabitants are imperiled.”

This is, at best, “not proven”. CO2 levels are still lower than they have been at many times in the past, and at none of those times were the health of the planet’s inhabitants imperiled as a whole. There have been many times when many times when climatological cycles have altered the climate of the planet enough to affect various species, but life as a whole has rarely been imperiled.

Short of the sun going nova, there is nothing that can imperil the health of the *planet*. You might be able to argue that some radical shift (and I do mean radical, such as no oxygen, or precipitous drop in nitrogen) in the atmosphere could imperil the *biosphere*, but even then, that’s not what we’re talking about here. Geologically speaking, we’re in an interglacial period. Based on a review of various climatological records, we’re probably at or near the peak of this one. Our current climate is distinctly not the norm for this planet over the past several million years. The norm is way way colder. But, even if the climate does shift out of its historical pattern, there is almost no evidence that a warmer climate will cause anything like the destruction implied by the greeners. Generally warmth=life on this world.


11 posted on 05/18/2008 9:11:03 AM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson