To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Can it be proven or disproven, that none of this is relative to what one believes?
5 posted on
05/08/2008 7:54:27 AM PDT by
stuartcr
(Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
To: stuartcr
If one subscribes to relativism, an American society that says that certain acts are homophobis, racist, sexist, bigotted, and so on would not be superior to an American society which says that those same acts aren’t homophobic, racist, sexist, bigotted, etc.
If the relativist wants to say that ceratin things aren’t relative, then they must abandon relativism in favor of objectivism.
6 posted on
05/08/2008 8:07:19 AM PDT by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: stuartcr
One thing you all must understand when dealing with someone that is inculcated with postmodernist/relativist thinking is that they are
“comfortable with contradication”.
In other words, see my tagline.
12 posted on
05/08/2008 8:32:18 AM PDT by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: stuartcr
Can it be proven or disproven, that none of this is relative to what one believes?I used to be indecisive about this but now I'm not so sure..
14 posted on
05/08/2008 8:51:21 AM PDT by
Wil H
To: stuartcr
If there is no way to prove or disprove something absolutely, who then can prove that a society that says certain acts are homophobic, etc, is better than a society that says certain acts aren't homophobic?
Society? Societies - relativistically speaking - are social constructs that produce social constructs.
Without absolutes - and based upon social construction -neither society would be superior to the other.
18 posted on
05/08/2008 9:28:25 AM PDT by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson