Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

She must have something on him, or she wouldn't be spending her own money on the campaign...
1 posted on 05/07/2008 10:31:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Either she has something on him or the Dim superdelegate menagerie. I always wondered what you’d do with some 900 FBI files collecting dust in your attic...


2 posted on 05/07/2008 10:37:44 PM PDT by GOP_Raider (Maybe next year...I guess...Let's Go Sharks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
One thing I know is that a more cold and calculating couple of crooks than the Clintons has never appeared on the political scene throughout American history and perhaps - never.

This comment is patently absurd. Anyone with more than a passing interest in American history knows the Clintons follow an illustrious line of American politcial crooks.

One only need to read the biographys of our founders and their era to find a mind blowing array of crooks, shysters and thieves in a political arena that makes ours tame by comparison.

3 posted on 05/07/2008 10:39:12 PM PDT by stravinskyrules (Why is it that whenever I hear a piece of music I don't like, it's always by Villa-Lobos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bill Clinton would prove however that the Democrats can forgive sex. Your theory that they have information on Obama seems like it might be plausible. Why they wouldn't have used it already though is a question. Also could the information be something non-sex related, possibly more likely, e.g. linking Obama more to people linked to terrorism.
4 posted on 05/07/2008 10:39:28 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
She must have something on him, or she wouldn't be spending her own money on the campaign...

She may well have 'something on him', however, Hillary would not be in the position she now finds herself if she really were all that politically astute. Half of the country despises her and almost half of the democrats, especially liberal men. Liberal men LOVE old Bill, because he had in their opinion more fun than anyone is suppose to get away with having.

Hillary does NOT know how to face defeat, and this time there is no 'vast right wing conspiracy' to point her wicked witched finger at to blame. Even lord McCain her best friend in the Senate has said she would make a goooooood president. And even their greatest nemesis Rush has been more than kind to her plight, and yet she is still behind in the numbers. But to her liberal mind the numbers are NOT relevant, this is her destiny come .ell or high water.

6 posted on 05/07/2008 10:42:32 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
She must have something on him, or she wouldn't be spending her own money on the campaign...

Perhaps, but if that is so, she's gonna play it soon. The OP suggestion that it will happen after the convention is a bit silly, don't you think?

7 posted on 05/07/2008 10:42:39 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I also know they do nothing without their own personal and political interests being at the fore - nothing. They are as corrupt and contemptible as any creatures to ever walk on two legs. They are literally the spawn of Hell. True demons among us. Nothing they say or do should or can be trusted. And I am being generous and as kind as I can.

Well, at least the author didn't let emotion get in the way of this candid and objective assessment. ;-)

I don't think waiting until after Obama is nominated to reveal a sexual piccadillo is a particularly sound tactic, and the Clintons of all people know it. At that point the MSM will have rallied around their boy Obama and will be furiously fending off any perceived threat just as they did for BJ Billy not so very long ago. "Can't we just censure and move on?" The Clintons remember, only the moveon.org folks are for Obama now, aren't they?

No, if they have it they'll have to use it and it'll have to be good. And Obama wasn't in the Senate when the FBI files mysteriously appeared in the White House basement. I have no basis for this other than gut feel but I think they do have it, and it isn't enough. Time will tell.

9 posted on 05/07/2008 10:47:04 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You make a good point .. I was leaning that way too. The Clintons are very greedy and they have talked a lot about all their millions. For her to give up over 12 million .. she knows something nobody else knows.

But .. I find it interesting that at one point in the race, Bill Clinton suggested Obama would be a great VP - even though Obama was ahead at the time.

Soooooo .. what if she offers Obama the VP spot - in lieu of her silence ..?? The Clintons are good at bribery .. and if the Clintons just happened to get ahold of Obama’s FBI file ..???


13 posted on 05/07/2008 10:52:26 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Yon: "The U.S. military is the most respected institution in Iraq.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; pissant

Clinton himself has admitted that Hillary has eaten more ‘Humas’ in her lifetime than he has.

If the media is complicent in taking BHO down and leaving her intact, over homosexuality, then we can only hope Joe Andrew will step up and take her down.

THIS is chaos.


14 posted on 05/07/2008 10:57:59 PM PDT by txhurl (Hillary is realizing that she's just another womyn who slept with Bill Clinton for nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This writer is guessing that “gay sex” involving either Barack or Michelle or both is what the “scandal” will be about that will force Barack from the race. That THIS is what would cause even his own supporters to abandon him.

That doesn’t make any sense to me.

What’s wrong with “gay sex”? (sarcasm)

Also, given the lowdown (so far kept secret by the MSM) on Hillary and her female “friend”, any allegations about THAT SUBJECT would simply enable the Obamaians to turn that around and point back at Hillary.

I’m convinced if WE know about her inseperable “friend” then the Obamaians know about it, too.


16 posted on 05/07/2008 10:59:56 PM PDT by txrangerette (Just say "no" to the Obama Cult and the Clinton Machine!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
One thing I know is that a more cold and calculating couple of crooks than the Clintons has never appeared on the political scene throughout American history and perhaps - never. I also know they do nothing without their own personal and political interests being at the fore - nothing. They are as corrupt and contemptible as any creatures to ever walk on two legs. They are literally the spawn of Hell. True demons among us. Nothing they say or do should or can be trusted. And I am being generous and as kind as I can.

Oh man, that's beautiful, sniff,,, put a tear to my eye in its sensibilities, sob..., so touchingly true and softly explained.......

17 posted on 05/07/2008 11:05:04 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If she does, it surely isn’t of a sexual nature.

Dems always get a pass on that kind of stuff.

I dread an Bhussama presidency so much that when I hear things like this, I’m almost thankful that the Clintons are rotten to the core.

Eliminating the chance of a Bhussama presidency is a filthy job that needs to be done. The Clintons might be the only people ruthless enough to deliver the fatal blow and actually get away with it.

Look at everything they’ve gotten away with so far.

It could happen.


19 posted on 05/07/2008 11:14:55 PM PDT by Califreak (Hangin' with Hunter-under the bus "Dread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If the Clinton’s have something dirty on Obama that would prevent him from serving as President, all they have to do is today (or months ago) take it to the super delegates. They then would agree not to vote for Obama, a group of party elders would tell him he cannot win the nomination, and the race would be over with Hillary the winner. There is no need to wait till the convention or to make it public.


20 posted on 05/07/2008 11:19:15 PM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have always thought Hillary would end up being the Dems nominee.


21 posted on 05/07/2008 11:21:35 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: taraytarah

PING


23 posted on 05/07/2008 11:27:29 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
One thing I know is that a more cold and calculating couple of crooks than the Clintons has never appeared on the political scene throughout American history and perhaps - never.

So true! 

24 posted on 05/07/2008 11:33:20 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I thought that this dirt on Obama was already public. Do a Google search for "Obama gay sex cocaine Larry Sinclair".

Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on your bias, Mr. Larry Sinclair makes the wrong Reverend Wright look credible. Perhaps the Clinton's have a way to lend credence to Mr. Sinclair's claims of sharing sex and cocaine with Mr. Obama. You can be sure they have sought out such.

25 posted on 05/07/2008 11:43:51 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s a very good point that they would not be putting their own money into her campaign, and we all know how much they LOVE money, if they thought it was all over. hmmmm...


26 posted on 05/07/2008 11:44:04 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (<----- Typical White Person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Anyone who has 48% of the vote for a nomination going into the convention in an era of terrorist assassinations has got to know that you don’t “drop out” until you are voted down.

She IS the next alternative. She IS the safety. YOU think she’ll give all of this up to Al Gore Junior AGAIN?


28 posted on 05/08/2008 12:30:29 AM PDT by weegee ("I didn't kill innocent people." - Bill Ayers, Weatherman. Terrorist. Obama's comrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I predict either Barack or Michelle Obama has had gay laissons and the Clintons can prove it."

I agree that she has something on him/her, but I doubt it is gay sex. Hillary herself suffers from that allegation so that could be a trade off.

I too believe she has the goods on him/her and is just waiting.

When the truth is known, I think Michelle rather than Barack is the one with the serious connection to Wright's church of racial animosity.

31 posted on 05/08/2008 1:14:25 AM PDT by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If she does, she sure doesn’t have until October to use it.


33 posted on 05/08/2008 2:15:29 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson