To: aft_lizard
creationism wasn’t used as a method to gut science. ID on the other hand does gut science.
One can not explore / question the universe when the answer to every question is ‘%deity% did it so don’t question it’.
It doesn’t help that the set of people who support ID overlaps quite a bit with the set of people who think vaccines are evil and the set of people who think the world is 6,000 years old.
45 posted on
04/20/2008 10:03:59 AM PDT by
tokenatheist
(Can I play with madness?)
To: tokenatheist
You are making an assumption based off of fear and prejudice. There is no evidence that what you say will inhibit technological progress.
51 posted on
04/20/2008 10:10:28 AM PDT by
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
To: tokenatheist
One can not explore / question the universe when the answer to every question is %deity% did it so dont question it. Therefore one must not be allowed to question evolutionists.
Atheist doublethink.
53 posted on
04/20/2008 10:13:16 AM PDT by
Mojave
To: tokenatheist
creationism wasnt used as a method to gut science. ID on the other hand does gut science.
One can not explore / question the universe when the answer to every question is %deity% did it so dont question it.
It doesnt help that the set of people who support ID overlaps quite a bit with the set of people who think vaccines are evil and the set of people who think the world is 6,000 years old.
Well, I can see that you have the talking points memorized but your parody of ID hasn't advanced the discussion.
Or perhaps you don't really understand ID.
Or perhaps you don't understand the metaphysical foundations of your viewpoint.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson