People keep responding to my post without apparently reading it. ID denies it is religion. My post was about ID. My problem with ID is exactly that they disguise their religion as science to circumvent the law as proven in open court. I did not pass judgement on the merits of the ruling itself, just that it is the law of the land. Please note that whenever you defend religion when I criticize ID, you are supporting me and calling Ben Stein a liar.
You’re trying to play both sides of the question, but you’re not slippery enough to pull it off. In #3, you said, “ID isn’t a theory. It is religion. I cited the SCOTUS case. It shouldn’rt taught in school only because it is illegal to do so.”
By your own words, you are an enemy of the Republic, agreeing that religion ought to be forbidden in public schools in direct opposition to the 1st Amendment. You believe religion should not be taught in public schools.
That sounds right to you, because it threatens YOUR religion, evolution.