You’re trying to play both sides of the question, but you’re not slippery enough to pull it off. In #3, you said, “ID isn’t a theory. It is religion. I cited the SCOTUS case. It shouldn’rt taught in school only because it is illegal to do so.”
By your own words, you are an enemy of the Republic, agreeing that religion ought to be forbidden in public schools in direct opposition to the 1st Amendment. You believe religion should not be taught in public schools.
That sounds right to you, because it threatens YOUR religion, evolution.
Who’s version of Christianity would you have the school teach?
How, by obeying the law, am I an enemy of the republic that created the law byits own process? Take your paxil