It ignores what has been successful in many other countries around the world in the last 50 years (some longer), It ignores the socioeconomic impact of "radical change", It ignores history, and the governments abysmal record of turning "populism" into unmitigated disasters, and generally, "what does not solve the problem, is not a solution"
It ignores what has been successful in many other countries around the world in the last 50 years (some longer), It ignores the socioeconomic impact of "radical change", It ignores history, and the governments abysmal record of turning "populism" into unmitigated disasters, and generally, "what does not solve the problem, is not a solution".
You have said all of these things dozens of times. When are YOU going to show some shred of evidence or authoritative analyses substantiating your prophecies of doom?? You haven't yet.
A presidential panel, many economists, many state sales tax departments, political scientists, and sociologists, have come out opposed to the FT ....
You said this before; I asked for some links; you posted a list of sites as proof; but, only one that damned the Fair Tax was a ,no doubt, overpriced tax lawyer, protecting his bread and butter.
Want to try again?
/waits for the usual assault
Still trying to pick another fight I see. Good luck.
And the moderator was already informed of your brandy-new "who wants to pick a fight" post on the new thread... You are being watched... closely.