[Elyse]

Some are now trying to spin it as a "pissant's revenge" action They aren't reading the e-mail closely.

I admit that when I first read the freepmail from Im4Fred that I didn't read it very closely. I was angry because he was implying that the website released our names to someone who was shilling for a candidate. I was angry that he was calling Hunter a socialist and a Rhino and that he implied the website owners were banning support of Hunter and Romney. I did not follow the link to the banning of pissant post.

When I read it more closely it brings up a lot of questions. It doesn't seem like a real call for donations to Thompson anymore. I now think it was designed to make people angry at the website owner and Thompson supporters.

[Brad’s Gramma]

I now think it was designed to make people angry at the website owner.....

I wouldn't doubt it...

[WalterSkinner]

I now think it was designed to make people angry at the website owner and Thompson supporters

..that's strange, because I didn't get that impression at all

I still vote for a Paul supporter or some DU troll--that just isn't pissant's style.

[no-to-illegals]

I now think it was designed to make people angry at the website owner and Thompson supporters.

I would have to say after having read all of the posts, and I received the email as well, this most likely was the intent of the email. Astute observation on your part... Politics is a passionate thingy....one cannot be involved (fully) without being passionate. Pissant was passionate. I applaud passion. Passion makes winners, not whiners.

[Shelayne]

When I read it more closely it brings up a lot of questions. It doesn't seem like a real call for donations to Thompson anymore. I now think it was designed to make people angry at the website owner and Thompson supporters.

Bingo!

[jmyrlefuller]

Well, let me say this much.

That was not a real Thompson supporter.

A Thompson supporter would have found a way to put a potshot “LOL” in that message somewhere.