Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article



Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Quick Reference
1 posted on 10/13/2007 5:27:31 AM PDT by Josh Painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sturm Ruger

Thanks for this post. I have noticed most of the bias from these columnists already, but it needs to be exposed and often. Shine the light on it.

I would also add that Mark Levin, a real stalwart and a cons titutionalist without peer who speaks very admiringly of Fred, does not hide the fact (as he says) that he “is leaning toward Thompson.” He has not committed, but it is not hard to tell just by listening to him, particularly because of his devotion to the Constitution, that Fred is the best fit.

If I could get through to him, I would ask him to analyze Romney’s implementation of the Goodridge decision in Massachusetts from a constitutional (i.e.-separation of powers) perspective. Even though not a federal constitutional issue, it provides some insight into how Romney views the Constitution and the relationship of the Branches, especially the power of the judiciary.


2 posted on 10/13/2007 8:16:43 AM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sturm Ruger

“Although Rubin is a regular at the conservative Spectator and is also published at Human Events, she wrote a piece for the liberal New York Observer titled Five Easy Arguments Against Fred Thompson.”

These are the same “conservatives” on the forum pushing that abortionist, Guiliani.


3 posted on 10/13/2007 8:41:50 AM PDT by Grunthor (http://franz.org/quiz.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sturm Ruger

Conspicuously absent on your list of pundits in this excellently and gratifying-to-read piece: Rush Limbaugh. Good ol’ Rush. God bless him. Or rather, God blessed us with Rush. And with you, Sturm, by the by way, and Doug from Upland, and Jim Robinson, and a whole lotta other wonderful folks here.


4 posted on 10/13/2007 10:42:10 AM PDT by Finny (We have enemies within, and one of them is envy. -- A British naval officer in time of war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sturm Ruger

Conspicuously absent on your list of pundits in this excellently written and gratifying-to-read piece: Rush Limbaugh. Good ol’ Rush. God bless him. Or rather, God blessed us with Rush. And with you, Sturm, by the by way, and Doug from Upland, and Jim Robinson, and a whole lotta other wonderful folks here.


5 posted on 10/13/2007 10:42:33 AM PDT by Finny (We have enemies within, and one of them is envy. -- A British naval officer in time of war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sturm Ruger

Conspicuously absent on your list of pundits in this excellently written and gratifying-to-read piece: Rush Limbaugh. Good ol’ Rush. God bless him. Or rather, God blessed us with Rush. And with you, Sturm, by the by way, and Doug from Upland, and Jim Robinson, and a whole lotta other wonderful folks here.


6 posted on 10/13/2007 10:42:33 AM PDT by Finny (We have enemies within, and one of them is envy. -- A British naval officer in time of war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sturm Ruger
Great article! Fred08 - Contribute Now
8 posted on 10/14/2007 1:20:09 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Security * Unity * Prosperity | Fred08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson