[AuntB]

Do you approve of the information and voting record in the article? Perhaps, as Thompson supporters you could talk about the facts presented. Do you agree with Thompson? Give your candidate some support, if you can or are you just here to slam Duncan Hunter?

[perfect_rovian_storm]

The poster of the original article has often made use of phony, cherrypicked, and false information so many times that bothering to read the article is a waste of time. Until a more reliable source does the research, there isn’t any point in discussing the ‘issues’.

However, we could talk about Duncan Hunter’s dismal record on spending, since the original poster has seen fit to bring up the subject.

How are those teapot museums working out for you?

[Petronski]

Here, have a nosh!

[rob777]

"Do you approve of the information and voting record in the article?"



No I do not, but when each candidate's overall record on spending is taking into account, the only ones with a better record than Fred are Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo. Ron is off the mark on the threat of Islam and Tom is widely perceived as a one issue candidate. Yes, Fred has missed the mark on a few issues, but on the whole he has a solid record as a limited government conservative and has the ability to communicate his principles effectively to the American people. I see no better choice available.