If folks want Her Heinous, they can continue dissing candidates who aren't their most perfect candidate, but DO have a chance of beating the Democrats. By doing nothing but complaining about how the viable candidates are not conservative enough, and threatening to not vote, or vote third party, they're only going to create a repeat of 1992. Folks don't realize how much their grousing just turns marginal voters off, and creates the opportunity for the wild eyed moonbat voters to have a greater influence on the outcome of the election.
Yes, I DO take it personally, because I don't want a Democrat in the White House. The stakes, both culturally and militarily are just way too high. My future, and the future of my family could very well depend on who is making the political decisions.
You didn't hear a thing I said. I submit that those whom are considered "viable" due to popular support are not viable because the base will not support them, or will not support them fully.
What that gets you in the general election is a whole lot of purple "red states". The supposition that purple "red states" can be overcome by winning blue states is a non-starter.
You may accuse me all you like, it doesn't change that fact.