As more and more discoveries are made about the complexities and the knife-edge, perfect balance of life, you will have to change your mind. Many of Darwin’s “proofs” have been and continue to be discredited, while Behe’s contentions become confirmed.
Sorry, that happens not to be the case.
I know the creationist websites keep claiming that, but they have been known to distort, misrepresent, and selectively quote, as well as to ignore evidence which contradicts their beliefs.
If you are looking for accurate portrayals of what science is discovering, creationist websites should not be high on your list of sources.
Ah, yes, the old "creationism hasn't managed to come up with scientific evidence for creationism or against evolutionary biology over the past several thousand years, but by gosh, we're sure it'll triumph scientifically Real Soon Now, just you wait!"
Color me unimpressed with your progress so far. "ID" is the world's oldest dead-end hypothesis.
Many of Darwin’s “proofs” have been and continue to be discredited,
Such as? Warning: If you quote examples from creationist websites, you're bound to embarrass yourself by citing "examples" that are creationist misrepresentations instead of actual problems with evolution.
while Behe’s contentions become confirmed.
Again, feel free to give your very best example, so that we can see how well Behe's best hold up when put to the test.