Regarding your claim that "[a] large segment of the evolutionist community is made up of a bunch of scared, grant-begging frauds . . . and they do not hesitate to publish a bunch of lying, twisted twaddle to keep the scam going," you now say "truth is never slander. It might be hard on the people who fit the mold, but it is not slander."
And regarding my assumption that you are utterly ignorant of the scientific literature, you say "some more of your arrogant assumptions BASED ON NOTHING, as usual."
Since you claim to have "truth" on your side, and you insist that my assumption of your ignorance is completely groundless, you are now presented with a golden opportunity to remove all reasonable doubt about your assertions. You are, after all, adamant about what is "proven" and "unproven" in science, so it seems that you would be equally adamant about "proving" your own point.
Take off after that NIH digital archive I linked in post 87. It's a downright handy compendium of working scientists and scientific publications. All you have to do is scan the archive and identify the scientists who are frauds and the "lying, twisted twaddle" they've published. Piece of cake.
I prefer to take you are your words posted in # 97 --
In short, no need to deal with you ever again.
Or are you a liar, as well as arrogant and boring?